[side note: I run Tor middle-nodes and bridges, although I do not have the
intestinal fortitude -- or a suitably supportive ISP -- to run an exit node]
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:35:45AM +0100, Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
> Occasionally, spam or more often, log-in attempts and dictionary
>
> On Feb 17, 2020, at 1:18 PM, G. Miliotis via mailop wrote:
>
> On 17/2/2020 22:39, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
>> One could state facts – i.e., pointing out that SPF will break straight
>> forwarding and mailing lists that do not rewrite – without introducing
>> judgement.
>
> How
On 17/2/2020 22:39, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
One could state facts – i.e., pointing out that SPF will break
straight forwarding and mailing lists that do not rewrite – without
introducing judgement.
How about a small section in the FAQ about decisions that the mail admin
must make?
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:45 PM Luis E. Muñoz via mailop
wrote:
> Unfortunately, we are operating in a world where legitimate forwarding
> is far outweighed by spoofed email and SPF is a response to that. If
> forwarding is expected, cooperating mail systems can make arrangements
> – i.e., ARC
On 17 Feb 2020, at 11:20, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
My personal experience with SPF is that it is less helpful than
harmful, at least when mail server operators use it for
rejection instead of tagging. It can help reject some mails with fake
sender information, but at the same
Am 17.02.20 um 19:21 schrieb Alessandro Vesely via mailop:
> On Sun 16/Feb/2020 15:21:34 +0100 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
>> (opinionated) Don' use SPF, it's broken by design.
>
> I don't think that a FAQ starting with such opinionated entries is going
> anywhere.
>
>
> Best
> Ale
I
Regarding the suggestion for "content/questions/answers/links to put on the
website" - have you ever considered making this mailing list into a forum?
I just like discussion forums a lot better than I do discussion mailing lists.
In my opinion, it's easier to contribute within a forum
On Sun 16/Feb/2020 15:21:34 +0100 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
> (opinionated) Don' use SPF, it's broken by design.
I don't think that a FAQ starting with such opinionated entries is going
anywhere.
Best
Ale
--
___
mailop
Am 16.02.2020 22:15, schrieb Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop:
Dnia 16.02.2020 o godz. 15:21:34 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop pisze:
1. Don't hide behind anonymity. Mail server domain whois should have
an identifiable registrant organization, there
[...]
8. (opinionated) Don' use SPF, it's broken
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, ngel via mailop wrote:
> I contacted them in order to warn them about the issue. They are not
> aware of any email issue and asked for the destination mailbox that had
> problems.
I was given the e-mail address
correosduap...@correos.es
from a local post office and it
Hello
I contacted them in order to warn them about the issue. They are not
aware of any email issue and asked for the destination mailbox that had
problems.
The most interesting piece was that they mentioned their email addresses
use correos.com not correos.es
correos.com does have a working MX:
Hi,
On Mon 17/Feb/2020 10:35:45 +0100 Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
>
> We operate Spamtraps which feed the SWINOG Anti-Spam Blacklist.
>
> A feedback loop is sent to the abuse-c of the IP Address from which
> email or attackts to spamtraps was detected.
>
> Occasionally, spam or more
> Either links to existing material or specific stuff written for pages
> on would be welcome.
Blocking of compromised mail accounts (for Exim):
https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/BlockCracking
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
Dear List
We operate Spamtraps which feed the SWINOG Anti-Spam Blacklist.
A feedback loop is sent to the abuse-c of the IP Address from which
email or attackts to spamtraps was detected.
Occasionally, spam or more often, log-in attempts and dictionary
attacks on the submission ports of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
