On 2/19/2021 10:43 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
Once again, people sending you an abuse report are doing you a favor.
In my experience, If you can't figure out how to deal with
attachments, I doubt you can manage your network.
I have lost track of which provider we are discussing BUT I
In article <20210219141529991171...@bob.proulx.com> you write:
>Simon Arlott via mailop wrote:
>> Nope, not a "good" provider:
>>
>> On 14/02/2021 10:32, Linode Abuse wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > Thank you for sending this email to us. So that we can verify this
>> > complaint, would you be
I agree that Linode is proactive and want to do the right thing. Cheap self
provisioned hosting attracts a lot of abuse though and they have their work cut
out for them
--srs
From: mailop on behalf of Allen Kitchen
(zoominternet) via mailop
Sent: Saturday,
Simon Arlott via mailop wrote:
> Nope, not a "good" provider:
>
> On 14/02/2021 10:32, Linode Abuse wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Thank you for sending this email to us. So that we can verify this
> > complaint, would you be able to send over the header information in the
> > email in a response
Am 19.02.21 um 17:45 schrieb Michael Peddemors via mailop:
> Any other hosting companies that you would "recommend" for email hosting?
The sad (no, actually good) truth is that there are so many good hosters that
recommending one or a few would always be
highly subjective and wouldn't do
On 2021-02-19 11:00 a.m., Simon Arlott via mailop wrote:
On 19/02/2021 16:45, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
For instance, have to shout out to the Linode guys for really improving
their reputation, over the last couple of years.. (still wish they
provided 'rwhois' entries, at least on
On 19/02/2021 16:45, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> For instance, have to shout out to the Linode guys for really improving
> their reputation, over the last couple of years.. (still wish they
> provided 'rwhois' entries, at least on customer demand, would make it
> easier to see when
I have an idea.. (No Pitching your own service)
We always post the bad things about bad hosting providers..
I mean of course, often the old adage is you get what you pay for..
But maybe it would be good to point out hosting companies that have a
GOOD reputation for hosting email servers, or
Am 19.02.21 um 10:36 schrieb Benoît Panizzon via mailop:
> Hi List
>
> One of our customers way desperately trying to reach company hosting
> it's email services namecheaphosting.com
>
> eforward1.registrar-servers.com[162.255.118.51] was constantly
> rejecting our customers emails as spam. We
Hi List
One of our customers way desperately trying to reach company hosting
it's email services namecheaphosting.com
eforward1.registrar-servers.com[162.255.118.51] was constantly
rejecting our customers emails as spam. We wanted to find the cause.
Maybe some weird email forwarding problem?
10 matches
Mail list logo
