As far as I can tell, there's nothing you can do. You can try a non-Hetzner IP, sure, but plenty of people on here (like
me!) have a dedicated IP in their own IP space for sending mail and still go straight to Hotmail-Junk.
Rate limiting might help, but if you send too *few* mails Microsoft's
The fact that filling out their support ticket does nothing except generate
canned responses and that you have to come here to Mailops to get any
movement on a blocked IP address or blocked server - you would think that
that would tell Microsoft something about how ineffective their support
ticket
On 01/05/2021 10:09, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
>
>
> On 01.05.21 09:05, Chris via mailop wrote:
>> Heh. You've never used Qpsmtpd or Haraka, I can tell. Haraka and
>
> Nope. Didn't have to. That's why I was curious about use cases that were
> not possible with the more common MTAs.
>
Hi!
(I'm new here, so if I'm doing mistakes, do not hesitate to tell me with
MP, or public, I'd like to respect the community)
We are a small provider based in France ( https://indiehosters.net ) and
we have all in place (DMARC, DKIM, PTR, SNDS, JMRP, and a really strict SPF)
Since a
It appears that Chris via mailop said:
>There's a third called "mailfront" that uses plugin C
>modules. I know almost nothing more about it, other than its similar in
>intent/architecture. I think the community surrounding it is even smaller.
>
>Still running it John?
Yup, works great. It's
It appears that Chris via mailop said:
>There's a third called "mailfront" that uses plugin C
>modules. I know almost nothing more about it, other than its similar in
>intent/architecture. I think the community surrounding it is even smaller.
>
>Still running it John?
Yup, works great. It's
I can only agree. Using Outlook means check your junk for important mail and
find a lot of trash in your inbox.
We have moved countless new customers away from Outlook because of this issue.
I don't know why they don't care. Really.
> Am 01.05.2021 um 18:55 schrieb Matt Corallo via mailop :
If you're a small-scale sender, this is just the way it goes with Outlook.com - SNDS doesn't do anything except provide
you %s, and because the number of emails from small-scale senders is so low (and the "customers" here don't even pay for
the service), Microsoft isn't incentivized to fix the
> I used Postfix along time but my experience is that it is incredible
> difficult to implement custom logic especially across the different
> binaries/processes it uses to fulfil a mail delivery transaction. Its
> designed in the "unix philosophy" and has good performance - great but
>
On 01.05.21 09:05, Chris via mailop wrote:
> Heh. You've never used Qpsmtpd or Haraka, I can tell. Haraka and
Nope. Didn't have to. That's why I was curious about use cases that were
not possible with the more common MTAs.
> qpsmtpd are basically skeletons where you can insert plugins to
>
I forgot the "selling point" that hooked me: The specification.
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/index.html
It simply contains everything you need. But the reader has to
understand, that setup/operation of mail server can be a complex task.
As you're on *this* mailop
Hi Rob,
I'm biased as part of the Exim development team.
Exim
- is actively maintained
- has a huge user base
- provides more flexibility than other MTA I'm aware of (but, this is
*my* PoV)
> That mean Exim is the only real choice? It was a good laughing from this
> recent mailop post about
Heh. You've never used Qpsmtpd or Haraka, I can tell. Haraka and
qpsmtpd are basically skeletons where you can insert plugins to
do/redefine anything you want pre/during/post any step of SMTP. Want to
extend/redefine SMTP? Sure. Parallelize queries to any kind of
database? Fine. Regexp
Hello MRob,
On 01.05.21 05:18, MRob via mailop wrote:
> I used Postfix along time but my experience is that it is incredible
> difficult to implement custom logic especially across the different
> binaries/processes it uses to fulfil a mail delivery transaction. Its
> designed in the "unix
14 matches
Mail list logo
