Re: [mailop] Feasibility of a private DNSBL

2021-11-10 Thread Rob McEwen via mailop
On 11/10/2021 9:58 PM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote: On 2021-11-10 11:47 a.m., Rob McEwen via mailop wrote: The only issue here is that, for every user/customer that needs a unique key, an entirely different set of data has to be loaded into memory on the server. That's a huge

Re: [mailop] Feasibility of a private DNSBL

2021-11-10 Thread Rob McEwen via mailop
On 11/10/2021 10:35 PM, Chris via mailop wrote: On 2021-11-10 10:09 p.m., Collider via mailop wrote: Wait - Spamhaus dnsd is in C++? No. I'm the one who mentioned "C++", sorry if that wasn't accurate. It's been almost 4 years since I dug into the source code and made my own custom mods,

Re: [mailop] Feasibility of a private DNSBL

2021-11-10 Thread Chris via mailop
On 2021-11-10 9:58 p.m., Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote: On 2021-11-10 11:47 a.m., Rob McEwen via mailop wrote: Already, the source/git are in too many multiple places. Whatever happened to giving back to opensource?  I think you are building on other's 'hard-earned expertise' as well.

Re: [mailop] Feasibility of a private DNSBL

2021-11-10 Thread Chris via mailop
On 2021-11-10 10:09 p.m., Collider via mailop wrote: Wait - Spamhaus dnsd is in C++? No. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Feasibility of a private DNSBL

2021-11-10 Thread Collider via mailop
Wait - Spamhaus dnsd is in C++? On 11 November 2021 02:58:58 UTC, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote: >On 2021-11-10 11:47 a.m., Rob McEwen via mailop wrote: >> The only issue here is that, for every user/customer that needs a unique >> key, an entirely different set of data has to be loaded

Re: [mailop] Feasibility of a private DNSBL

2021-11-10 Thread Michael Peddemors via mailop
On 2021-11-10 11:47 a.m., Rob McEwen via mailop wrote: The only issue here is that, for every user/customer that needs a unique key, an entirely different set of data has to be loaded into memory on the server. That's a huge limitation. It doesn't "scale". Therefore, for invaluement, in our

[mailop] tmobile tmomail.net Contact

2021-11-10 Thread Curtis Maurand via mailop
Hello, Would someone from tmobile/tmomail.net please contact me off list? Thanks in advance, Curtis Maurand Xyonet Webhosting mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Feasibility of a private DNSBL

2021-11-10 Thread Rob McEwen via mailop
On 11/10/2021 2:31 PM, Chris via mailop wrote: like any other DNS server, you *can* implement a single key by putting your DNSBL zone under a name like ".example.com" The only issue here is that, for every user/customer that needs a unique key, an entirely different set of data has to be

Re: [mailop] Feasibility of a private DNSBL

2021-11-10 Thread Chris via mailop
I've checked. The Spamhaus publicly distributed version of rbldnsd does not support multiple DQS-style keys. But, like any other DNS server, you *can* implement a single key by putting your DNSBL zone under a name like ".example.com", and as long as the mail servers that are supposed to