Re: [mailop] fate of rr.com addresses

2021-12-05 Thread John Levine via mailop
It appears that Robert Schoneman via mailop said: >Does anyone know what the fate of email addresses that end in rr.com will be? My old twcny.rr.com address from when I had TWC/RR/Spectrum service still works, even though I switched broadband providers two years ago. I don't see anything

Re: [mailop] fate of rr.com addresses

2021-12-05 Thread Fernando Cassia via mailop
I found this "In 2012 Roadrunner was bought by Time Warner Cable (TWC) and rebranded as Spectrum. In 2015 Charter Communications purchased TWC and therefore the Spectrum brand. As a result of the rebrand, all roadrunner.com and rr.com emails have been phased out and rebranded as Spectrum. ...

[mailop] fate of rr.com addresses

2021-12-05 Thread Robert Schoneman via mailop
Does anyone know what the fate of email addresses that end in rr.com will be? We've started to get a lot of auto-responses to emails sent to *.rr.com addresses saying "my email has changed". The auto-responses follow a standard format which makes me feel like Spectrum/Charter are trying to kill

Re: [mailop] postmaster: envelope vs header

2021-12-05 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021, Slavko via mailop wrote: > I think a little about it, but i cannot find other way than do not use > To: header at all, which will be penalized in my anti-spam SW latter. "What's the problem you are trying to solve?" Is this about the differences between envelope and

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] comcast.net MX

2021-12-05 Thread Jay Hennigan via mailop
On 12/5/21 03:15, Slavko via mailop wrote: Hi, Dňa Sun, 5 Dec 2021 10:12:24 + ml+mailop--- via mailop napísal: RFC 5321 SMTP October 2008 o The reserved mailbox name "postmaster" may be used in a RCPT command without domain

Re: [mailop] postmaster: envelope vs header

2021-12-05 Thread Slavko via mailop
Hi, Dňa Sun, 5 Dec 2021 11:24:04 + ml+mailop--- via mailop napísal: > Anyway, my mail was only about a clear violation of the (SMTP) RFC > by comcast. Yes, i understand that, and my question was not to you only (sorry, if it was not clean). I think a little about it, but i cannot find

Re: [mailop] postmaster: envelope vs header

2021-12-05 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021, Slavko via mailop wrote: > But, please, what about header: > To: postmaster > ... rejected after DATA: header syntax: unqualified address not > permitted: failing address in "To:" header is: postmaster The syntax for envelope addresses and header addresses is

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] comcast.net MX

2021-12-05 Thread Slavko via mailop
Hi, Dňa Sun, 5 Dec 2021 10:12:24 + ml+mailop--- via mailop napísal: > RFC 5321 SMTP October > 2008 > >o The reserved mailbox name "postmaster" may be used in a RCPT > command without domain qualification (see Section 4.1.1.3) and >

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] comcast.net MX

2021-12-05 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: > 220 resimta-h1p-037571.sys.comcast.net resimta-h1p-037571.sys.comcast.net > ESMTP server ready > rcpt to: > 550 5.1.1 Not our customer RFC 5321 SMTP October 2008 o The reserved

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] comcast.net MX

2021-12-05 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
Hi, today it works. I sent 6 messages in the early morning, 03:52~03:55 UCT, and they were delivered successfully. I only use IPv4. Yesterday: 1492-north:log$ telnet mx1h1.comcast.net 25 Trying 96.102.157.178... Connected to mx1h1.comcast.net. Escape character is '^]'. 220