(... sorry for top-posting ...)
Dear Jarland,
In the whole story, i feel that you are NICE guy!
NICE(= faithful + technical + reasonable)
Thanks ^^^
Sincerely, Linux fan Byung-Hee
Jarland Donnell via mailop writes:
> It's a good topic, and one I'm fairly passionate about. Obviously at
>
It's a good topic, and one I'm fairly passionate about. Obviously at
small scale it's super easy to tell when anything is off from normal,
but as you grow it's more difficult to rely on eyes and ears. But that
was kind of my dream: I want to be as present as though I'm one admin,
logged into
I'm prone to reading things like that as meaning "if you happen across
something" rather than "please go digging and if there's something to
find and you don't find it, you're dead."
On 2022-04-23 17:55, Jean-François Bachelet via mailop wrote:
Hello ^^)
Haven't read the full EU stuff yet,
> How can we be possibly become aware of such possible threats without SPYING
> -read it all- the email passing by our mail servers ??? only a jackass wana
> be terrst will put dangerous/alarm trigger stuff in the Subject of his
> emails. so do the EU wants us to play as NSA for free ? and
Hello ^^)
Haven't read the full EU stuff yet, but question :
How can we be possibly become aware of such possible threats without
SPYING -read it all- the email passing by our mail servers ???
only a jackass wana be terrst will put dangerous/alarm trigger stuff
in the Subject of his
Dnia 23.04.2022 o godz. 14:48:05 Dan Mahoney via mailop pisze:
>
> I would LOVE there to be legal structure to say “Gee, Equifax, you failed
> to demonstrate the basic opsec of paying some junior admin to type `yum
> upgrade apache-struts`, so you don’t get to keep my PII anymore.” I would
> love
Admittedly I do like the phrase "becomes aware of" as it should in
theory place the burden on a third party to prove awareness. Though I
can't imagine a lot of people become aware of a serious threat against
someone's life and then turn the other way, at least not anyone who
wouldn't now
It doesn't apply to phishing. Its very clear its about emergencies, ergo
threats about violence, bombs and such.
Phishing is definitely not a "threat to the life or safety of persons" as it
only poses a threat to property, ergo money.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Anne Mitchell via
>
>> I am not
>> familiar with the lawsuits, but the general solution to all reputation
>> services, whether IP-reputation, consumer credit, or any other business
>> that collects information about other subjects (the building block of
>> surveillance capitalism!) is consent: if the subject does
"Where an online platform becomes aware of any information giving rise to a
suspicion that a serious criminal offence involving a threat to the life or
safety of persons has taken place, is taking place or is likely to take place,
it shall promptly inform the law enforcement or judicial
10 matches
Mail list logo
