On Tue, Dec 19, 2023, at 7:20 PM, Tara Natanson via mailop wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:29 PM Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks all for the suggestions. I will give a try to some of them to
>> see if they are a good fit for our usage case.
>>
>> We
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:29 PM Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks all for the suggestions. I will give a try to some of them to
> see if they are a good fit for our usage case.
>
> We handle around 300 domains, most of them with 5-10 mailboxes...
I wouldn't want to see their breakfast! ;)
> Maybe they have just started eating their own dog food V2.0 at MS? ;->
>
> SCNR.
>
> Best,
>
> -C.
>
> > Am 15.12.2023 um 11:37 schrieb Laurent S. via mailop :
> >
> > It seems Microsoft made very recently a change. Since then, we get a
>
> On 19.12.2023 at 12:19 Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
>
> On Tue 19/Dec/2023 09:21:55 +0100 Taavi Eomäe wrote:
>> Considering how Gmail and quite a few widespread DKIM implementations still
>> don't support EdDSA DKIM, I wouldn't get my hopes too high.
>
>
> Won't any Google insider
Hi all,
Thanks all for the suggestions. I will give a try to some of them to
see if they are a good fit for our usage case.
We handle around 300 domains, most of them with 5-10 mailboxes... so the
volume of reports can get pretty wild.
Best regards.
El 19/12/23 a las 18:16, Slavko via
Am 19.12.2023 um 17:20:20 Uhr schrieb Slavko via mailop:
> Please, understand i properly, that it is no vulnerabiliy in SMTP
> itself, but in (some) implementations/servers only?
According to the stuff I read, sendmail and Postfix (and more) are
affected, for sendmail a patched version exists
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023, Slavko via mailop wrote:
> Please, understand i properly, that it is no vulnerabiliy in SMTP itself,
> but in (some) implementations/servers only?
The RFC is very precise about line endings and "end of message".
Some (legacy) MTAs try to be "nice" and accept other line
Dňa 19. decembra 2023 12:31:11 UTC používateľ Mark Alley via mailop
napísal:
>Hey all, recently saw this mail server SMTP vulnerability that popped up on
>a blog yesterday. Sharing here for those interested.
Please, understand i properly, that it is no vulnerabiliy in SMTP itself,
but in (some)
Dňa 19. decembra 2023 15:29:43 UTC používateľ Mark Alley via mailop
napísal:
>Is that on Github somewhere? I'd be glad to add it to the list.
Thanks, but no, it is not published (officially).
But if someone (small/personal/family domains) is interested,
i can share it.
regards
--
Slavko
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023, Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop wrote:
I'm starting to deploy DMARC records in all our managed domains, but we don't
have any specific tool to parse and extract meaningful information from the
reports.
Do you have any recomendations?
I process such reports using a
Is that on Github somewhere? I'd be glad to add it to the list.
On 12/19/2023 9:20 AM, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Dňa 19. decembra 2023 15:02:15 UTC používateľ Mark Alley via
mailop napísal:
https://dmarcvendors.com/#Self-Hosted_Solutions
I use own python script (piped from exim), which
Here at Sarbacane, we use https://github.com/domainaware/parsedmarc to
parse it in Json, then feed it to an ELK (elastic / Kibana) with a
dashboard we built.
Its basic but convenient as an ESP when you want to control all these data.
[image: Alexandre Schmit-Baverel]
*Alexandre Schmit-Baverel*
Dňa 19. decembra 2023 15:02:15 UTC používateľ Mark Alley via mailop
napísal:
>https://dmarcvendors.com/#Self-Hosted_Solutions
I use own python script (piped from exim), which extracts report's
attachment, stores XML in directories (by month) and reports are
shown/parsed by nginx and its
On Tuesday 19/12/2023 at 3:12 am, Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop
wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting to deploy DMARC records in all our managed domains, but
we
don't have any specific tool to parse and extract meaningful
information
from the reports.
Do you have any recomendations?
Most (all?)
https://dmarcvendors.com/#Self-Hosted_Solutions
- Mark Alley
On 12/19/2023 2:47 AM, Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting to deploy DMARC records in all our managed domains, but
we don't have any specific tool to parse and extract meaningful
information from the reports.
https://github.com/domainaware/parsedmarc
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM Scott Mutter via mailop
wrote:
> If DMARC reports could be sent in JSON format, they would be more easily
> parseable.
>
> At least, that's my opinion.
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 2:47 AM Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop
If DMARC reports could be sent in JSON format, they would be more easily
parseable.
At least, that's my opinion.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 2:47 AM Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting to deploy DMARC records in all our managed domains, but we
> don't
On 2023-12-19 at 01:12:56 UTC-0500 (Tue, 19 Dec 2023 07:12:56 +0100)
Benny Pedersen via mailop
is rumored to have said:
EHLO after STARTTLS, clearly bots only
Nope. Vide:
Dec 19 08:31:47 shiny postfix/smtpd[94038]: disconnect from
mxout1-he-de.apache.org[95.216.194.37] ehlo=2 starttls=1
Hey all, recently saw this mail server SMTP vulnerability that popped up on
a blog yesterday. Sharing here for those interested.
https://sec-consult.com/blog/detail/smtp-smuggling-spoofing-e-mails-worldwide/
-Mark Alley
___
mailop mailing list
Dňa 19. decembra 2023 11:11:28 UTC používateľ Alessandro Vesely via mailop
napísal:
>Won't any Google insider shred some lite on why a generally technically sound
>company lags like that?
Especially, when they de facto require DKIM ...
regards
--
Slavko
https://www.slavino.sk/
On Tue 19/Dec/2023 09:21:55 +0100 Taavi Eomäe wrote:
Considering how Gmail and quite a few widespread DKIM implementations still
don't support EdDSA DKIM, I wouldn't get my hopes too high.
Won't any Google insider shred some lite on why a generally technically sound
company lags like that?
On Tue 19/Dec/2023 09:47:15 +0100 Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop wrote:
I'm starting to deploy DMARC records in all our managed domains, but we don't
have any specific tool to parse and extract meaningful information from the
reports.
Do you have any recomendations?
The most basic
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:21:55AM +0200, Taavi Eomäe via mailop wrote:
> Considering how Gmail and quite a few widespread DKIM implementations still
> don't support EdDSA DKIM, I wouldn't get my hopes too high.
Please note that ECDSA != EdDSA. And EdDSA stuff only turned up in FIPS
a short
It's getting better, but RSA will be with us for some years yet.
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023, at 7:03 AM, Michael W. Lucas via mailop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last I checked a few years ago, validation of ECDSA DKIM keys was
> still iffy on deployed servers. Has the situation improved? Can we
> recommend ECDSA
Hi,
I'm starting to deploy DMARC records in all our managed domains, but we
don't have any specific tool to parse and extract meaningful information
from the reports.
Do you have any recomendations?
Best regards
--
Eduardo Díaz Comellas
Ultreia Comunicaciones, S.L.
Considering how Gmail and quite a few widespread DKIM implementations
still don't support EdDSA DKIM, I wouldn't get my hopes too high.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
26 matches
Mail list logo
