We choose our limits based on the base64 size and message that to the user,
ie we say we handle
25MB attachments and set the message size limit at 4/3*25 + some overhead.
For most users, trying to explain the differences is not useful.
Brandon
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:43 PM Grant Taylor via
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 5:19 PM Ángel via mailop wrote:
> On 2020-10-24 at 14:38 +0100, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> > How reliable is the SIZE value in the EHLO response ?
>
> I would say it's reliable on how much they are able to receive.
> Although it doesn't mean they are willing
On 2020-10-24 at 14:38 +0100, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> How reliable is the SIZE value in the EHLO response ?
I would say it's reliable on how much they are able to receive.
Although it doesn't mean they are willing to send messages that big.
I was in the same boat as Adam a few
Am 24.10.20 um 19:19 schrieb John Levine via mailop:
>
> FTP was swell forty years ago but it's obsolete now. Nothing,
> including the user names or passwords, is encrypted, and it needs to
> set up a second TCP connection for each data transfer which confuses
> NATs and firewalls.
>
> There are
In article <20201024112039.ga5...@rafa.eu.org>,
Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
>Dnia 24.10.2020 o godz. 01:36:08 Kenneth Porter via mailop pisze:
>>
>> The biggest problem with getting business partners to use FTP is
>> that they're often not allowed to use 3rd party software (like
>
>In my
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020, Sidsel Jensen via mailop wrote:
On 23 Oct 2020, at 20.08, Michael Peddemors via mailop
wrote:
By default we still distribute with a 10MG maximum size, but frankly almost all
of our customers has bumped it to the maximum we recommend, which is 20MG.
(the odd one even
] Maximum message size
On 23 Oct 2020, at 20.08, Michael Peddemors via mailop
mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
By default we still distribute with a 10MG maximum size, but frankly almost all
of our customers has bumped it to the maximum we recommend, which is 20MG.
(the odd one even went
> On 23 Oct 2020, at 20.08, Michael Peddemors via mailop
> wrote:
>
> By default we still distribute with a 10MG maximum size, but frankly almost
> all of our customers has bumped it to the maximum we recommend, which is
> 20MG. (the odd one even went to 30, but we don't recommend that)
>
>
Dnia 24.10.2020 o godz. 01:36:08 Kenneth Porter via mailop pisze:
>
> The biggest problem with getting business partners to use FTP is
> that they're often not allowed to use 3rd party software (like
In my opinion, the biggest problem to use FTP is that it requires several
steps which are not
--On Saturday, October 24, 2020 2:35 AM +0200 Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
Why nobody ever tried to write a RFC for something like
"sendfile" and implement it in MUAs?
There was discussion recently on the Internet History list about FTP and
how it used to be how email was done before
: [mailop] Maximum message size - tag along question.
Do you take into account the 4/3 inflation with Base64 encoding and / or allow
for any message body when setting the maximum message size that your servers
allow?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
___
mailop
Do you take into account the 4/3 inflation with Base64 encoding and / or
allow for any message body when setting the maximum message size that
your servers allow?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Dnia 23.10.2020 o godz. 22:48:42 Adam Moffett via mailop pisze:
>
> An additional argument is how much support labor is it worth to
> guide/force/teach the use of cloud storage compared to the risks of
> allowing larger emails? One of these is things is way easier.
> Someday I may bow to the
On 24.10.20 00:48, Adam Moffett via mailop wrote:
> Nail on head Brandon.
>
> An additional argument is how much support labor is it worth to
> guide/force/teach the use of cloud storage compared to the risks of
> allowing larger emails? One of these is things is way easier. Someday
> I may
and compatibility. (BTW: *I* don't store my
documents in my email. I'm just saying I understand why people do)
-Adam
-- Original Message --
From: "Brandon Long via mailop"
To: "Thomas Walter"
Cc: "mailop"
Sent: 10/23/2020 5:30:00 PM
Subject: Re: [mailop] Maximum m
As much as we all may laugh at using email for these things, there are a
bunch of benefits to it. For example, telling someone at a company to use
some random external service to host their potentially confidential
material is not a great sell and probably against the rules at most large
1:51:08 PM
Subject: Re: [mailop] Maximum message size
Most if not all places ask that you use a file sharing solution - google drive,
box etc for large files.
--srs
From: mailop on behalf of Adam Moffett via mailop
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 11:17:00 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subje
mailto:a...@plexicomm.net>>;
"mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org>"
mailto:mailop@mailop.org>>
Sent: 10/23/2020 1:39:06 PM
Subject: Re: [mailop] Maximum message size
How many providers are going to accept 200 mb emails if you enable this and
someone then tries to send
On 23.10.20 22:51, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote:
> Perhaps someone should come up with a protocol designed to transfer
> files. They could name it File Transfer Protocol and abbreviate it FTP.
I'd prefer something with "Secure" in it's name though, preferably in
the front, so it shows the
Dnia 23.10.2020 o godz. 17:47:00 Adam Moffett via mailop pisze:
> Yes, it was set to 200MB years ago by request of an engineer sending
> CAD files.
> Now I have someone else who wants it larger.
Does that someone know that services like WeTransfer or similar exist? Or
that one can share files via
On 10/23/20 10:23, Adam Moffett via mailop wrote:
I'm at 200MB maximum message size and have someone requesting we
increase that limit.
Is there any current consensus on what it should be?
I think you'll find that the rest of the Internet has a limit far lower,
about 20 MB is
Never
From: mailop on behalf of Michael Peddemors via
mailop
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 11:38:53 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Maximum message size
By default we still distribute with a 10MG maximum size, but frankly
almost all of our customers has bumped
On 10/23/20 1:23 PM, Adam Moffett via mailop wrote:
> I'm at 200MB maximum message size and have someone requesting we
> increase that limit.
>
> Is there any current consensus on what it should be?
Sheesh... Sounds like someone needs Dropbox or Nextcloud...
--
inoc.net!rblayzor
XMPP:
By default we still distribute with a 10MG maximum size, but frankly
almost all of our customers has bumped it to the maximum we recommend,
which is 20MG. (the odd one even went to 30, but we don't recommend that)
Too bad this isnt' escalated to a recommended standard.
How about we use this
On 10/23/20 7:23 PM, Adam Moffett via mailop wrote:
I'm at 200MB maximum message size and have someone requesting we
increase that limit.
Is there any current consensus on what it should be?
Current default max. message size for Postfix configurations:
message_size_limit (default:
to something like NextCloud/GDrive/OneDrive et al..
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
From: mailop On Behalf Of Suresh Ramasubramanian
via mailop
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 1:39 PM
To: Adam Moffett ; mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Maximum message size
How
23/2020 1:39:06 PM
Subject: Re: [mailop] Maximum message size
How many providers are going to accept 200 mb emails if you enable this
and someone then tries to send one out?
--srs
From: mailop on behalf of Adam Moff
How many providers are going to accept 200 mb emails if you enable this and
someone then tries to send one out?
--srs
From: mailop on behalf of Adam Moffett via mailop
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 10:53:51 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] Maximum
I'm at 200MB maximum message size and have someone requesting we
increase that limit.
Is there any current consensus on what it should be?
-- Adam Moffett, Network Engineer
Plexicomm - Internet Solutions | www.plexicomm.net
Office: 1.866.759.4678 x104
29 matches
Mail list logo
