Re: [mailop] Spike in "554 Transaction failed" from Microsoft properties

Hi, FWIW, I observed the same today while exhanging quite low volumes Gilles Le 6 févr. 2016 12:27 AM, Frank Bulk a écrit : > > Today we had an abnormal number of messages that failed to deliver to > Microsoft properties due to "554 Transaction failed". > > We had 31 today,

Re: [mailop] Mail accepted by outlook.com/hotmail.com disappears.

eing made > about it. > very very cool, this mail dropping thing is absurd and pretty much any other option as harsh as it can be is going to be a better response :) let us know if you need a megaphone to amplify your noise ! -- Gilles Chehade https:

[mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

if there is something wrong in the format of our headers and if this could affect users of our software disregarding the kind of mails they send with it. I've been tackling this for hours before contacting the mailing list. Any help would be greatly appreciated, I'm running out of ideas :-) -- Gilles Chehade

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

e reputation (or lack thereof) > of your smarthost from Microsoft's perspective, something content-related, > or just MS being inscrutable. > > ... uh, given you're doing MTA development, you don't have test autoresponders > or anything else that might backscatter on th

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:49:48AM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote: > > > On Sep 21, 2016, at 4:02 AM, Gilles Chehade <gil...@poolp.org> wrote: > > > > > > I'm wondering if there is something wrong in the format of our headers > > and if this could affect user

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Gilles Chehade > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 6:02 AM > To: mailop@mailop.org > Subject: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ? > > Hi, > > I'm lead developer of an opensource MTA called OpenSMTPD. > > We run a mailing-

Re: [mailop] Storing 821 envelope recipients in an 822.Header?

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +1000, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > David Hofstee wrote: > > The X- type headers are deprecated... https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648 > > > Oh now there's a bad idea if ever I heard one... > > :/ > wow, missed that one :-/