Reboot of Buildfarm

Hi folks, I need to reboot the farm, it will be available again later today. Sorry for the inconvenience — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

Re: Reboot of Buildfarm

Hi folks, Am 26.01.2017 um 10:04 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers <maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>: > I need to reboot the farm, it will be available again later today. Reboot is done, please let me know if you encounter anything suspicious. Best regards — Dago -- &

Re: libserf makefile

Hi Rupert, Am 13.11.2016 um 17:34 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen : > Am 13.11.2016 um 10:53 schrieb rupert THURNER >: >> could you do me a favor and have a look at the libserf makefile please? > > Sure! > >> as it is currently it

Re: amd53 on solaris 9

Hi Jörg, Am 05.12.2016 um 18:00 schrieb Joerg Schilling <joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de>: > Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers <maintainers@lists.opencsw.org> wrote: > >> # Solaris 9 package does not contain 64 bit on i386 as we have a separate >> Solaris

Re: amd53 on solaris 9

Hi Riccardo, Am 05.12.2016 um 16:44 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> I think I remember that you would "tweak" this since this build is useless >>> and at most there is a trick that on package assembly the 10x-amd64 >>> packages are copied in to

Re: amd53 on solaris 9

Hi Riccardo, Am 06.12.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> # Solaris 9 package does not contain 64 bit on i386 as we have a separate >>> Solaris 10 package >>> >SKIP_MODULATIONS-5.9 += isa-amd64 >>> >SKIP_MODULATIONS =

Re: updated CSWrdesktop recipe 1.8.0 -> 1.8.3

Hi Jake,. Am 09.03.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Jake Goerzen via maintainers : > I saw that your package CSWrdesktop could be bumped a few minor versions so > I went ahead and updated the recipe and committed it. I've built new packages > and they are in experimental:

Re: libidn - libidn2

Hi Riccardo, Am 28.07.2017 um 02:04 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > I need libidn2 ... to update gnutls :( > Actually, I force it to use libidn 1 or disable it alltogether to see if I > get forward with it, but maybe it is not the best. > > we have libidn 1, but no libidn

Re: SF.net SVN: gar:[26168] csw/mgar/pkg/openssl/trunk

Hi Riccardo, please revert that change, trunk is for 0.9.8 and should receive updates to minor revs only. There are branches like https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/pkg/openssl1/branches/openssl_101/Makefile Please start from there in a specific branch. Best regards

Re: strange ELF error

Hi, > Am 03.08.2017 um 00:48 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers > : > > Hi! > > I am trying to update gnutls3 to current! I did not get anything to build, so > I commited nothing yet. > > Build fails for me on Solaris10 Sparc: > > CCLD

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi Riccardo, Am 11.05.2017 um 00:17 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Sure, if in doubt just ask:-) >> > I can package on 9x, 10s, 10x. > However on 9s, I get these: > > > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += >

Re: Current issues

Hi Riccardo. Am 09.05.2017 um 23:59 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > >> Indeed, on solaris 10 freetype picks up harfbuzz automatically. I don't >> think the suggested procedure of building freetype, then harfbuzz then >> freetype again can be done

Current issues

Hi Riccardo, the updates lead to a number of hidden issues: the update of freetype introduced a cyclic dependency between freetype and harfbuzz as explained here: https://github.com/Homebrew/legacy-homebrew/issues/27847 This lead to stop catalog generation and seduced me to push the catalog

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi Riccardo, Am 09.05.2017 um 19:09 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > some updates on the OpenSSL 1.0.2 update process. > > I was able to update and clean up the build process. > It now builds on solaris 9, 10, 11 on x86 and sparc. > > I set for solaris9 pentium_pro as a

Re: Current issues

Hi Riccardo, Am 09.05.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> the updates lead to a number of hidden issues: the update of freetype >> introduced >> a cyclic dependency between freetype and harfbuzz as explained here: >>

Power Outage

Hi folks, we are currently experiencing an unplanned power outage in our datacenter. It looks like the UPS failed in a way which prevented the automatic bypass to work. We bypassed it now manually and will restart all machines during the day. The buildfarm, buildbot and catalog generation are

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi Riccardo, Am 12.05.2017 um 19:42 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> In this case I would just override with a comment explaining why >> the ISA was raised. > > 1.0.2k compiled on all platforms and test suite passed. > > Should I push my

Re: SF.net SVN: gar:[26210] csw/mgar/pkg/gs_ftp/trunk/Makefile

Hi Riccardo, Am 16.05.2017 um 15:40 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > let me add to this topic, since I have seen that also "gnome" apps, for > example, have different prefixes. > > One think is of course the original application name, it may already contain > the

OpenSSL 1.0.2l release

Hi, Am 31.05.2017 um 12:56 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen : > Am 31.05.2017 um 11:09 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : >> I hope my work on OpenSSL is of any use, Jan must be very busy as we all. > > Unfortunately yes, I have now installed OpenSSL from experimental

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi Riccarado, Am 30.04.2017 um 19:44 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Jan Holzhüter wrote: >> It builds and works at least the tests I did. >> It just needs update to new version and cross check with oracle pachtes. >> I wrote I users list a few months/years? back and ask for

Re: [openssl-announce] OpenSSL version 1.0.2l published

Hi Riccardo, > Am 30.05.2017 um 15:22 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > > Hi guys, The Solaris 11 version is lacking the 64 bit libssl.so.1.0.0 library! These lines were missing: dam@unstable11s [unstable11s]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/openssl1/branches/lts102 > /opt/csw/bin/svn

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: mirrors of opencsw unavailable

Hi folks, > Am 20.06.2018 um 19:23 schrieb Davis, Mark S CTR USARMY CEFC (US) via users > : > > I've tried this yesterday and today with the same result. Is it related? > > [coe-cpcuct01dcd]# /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -U To make a long story short: the webserver process hung, I just restarted it

Re: rebuilding WebServices / GNUTLS on 9

Hi Riccardo, > Am 01.05.2018 um 09:42 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > > Hi, > > I was rebuilding WebServices, of which now all libraries are up-to-date: > > I get this on Solaris 10s: > > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices += surplus-dependency|CSWperformance >

Re: rebuild a package - same version number,

Hi Riccardo, Am 29.04.2018 um 08:49 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > I have a question.. surely "trivial" but that is itching me. > > I need to issue a new release of certain packages: the dependencies they are > built on have been updated. > The

OpenCSW 10th Anniversary Camp

Dear maintainers, OpenCSW was founded 6. December 2008 and we will have our 10th anniversary this year! Personally I don’t have much to do with Solaris any more (as probably most of you too) but I still think back how much fun it was and I wonder what all the cool people from those days are

Fwd: SF.net SVN: gar:[26317] csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk

Hi Jake, in this case it is probably ok to do LINKER_MAPS = and also override the error for the package - it is probably worse to stick with an old TOR version than to upgrade Solaris. Best regards — Dago > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: > > Von: jake_goerzen--- via devel

Re: platforms build hangs at juicing

Hi, this is an issue with the wrapper for the Solaris 9 brand where fork hangs. I have not identified the issue yet. For starters you can build the packages individually and check the package for Solaris 9 Sparc on Solaris 10 by invoking checkpkg manually. Best regards — Dago > Am

Re: platforms build hangs at juicing

Hi Riccardo, > Am 30.01.2018 um 18:34 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers > <maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>: > > Hi, > > On 2018-01-30 16:19:26 +0100 Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers > <maintainers@lists.opencsw.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> t

Re: Opencsw login?

Hi Jörg, > Am 02.02.2018 um 17:07 schrieb Joerg Schilling via maintainers > : > > Hi, > > is the login server not working or why can't I login today? We had a complete outage - excavation at the provider destroyed our fiber, should be working again now  Best

Re: Opencsw login?

Hi Joerg, Am 05.02.2018 um 10:43 schrieb Joerg Schilling : > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> is the login server not working or why can't I login today? >> >> We had a complete outage - excavation at the provider destroyed our fiber, >>

Re: platforms build hangs at juicing

Hi Riccardo, Am 08.02.2018 um 10:47 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > you essentially do: > > dam@unstable10x [global]:/home/dam/staging/build-19.Jan.2018 > > PYTHONPATH=~/mgar/pkg/.buildsys/v2 ~/mgar/pkg/.buildsys/v2/bin/checkpkg > --os-releases=SunOS5.10

Re: ICU update

Hi Riccardo, > Am 20.02.2018 um 11:56 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers > : > > Hi, > > again, I answer myself :) this time I hope I have an easy question. > > On 2018-02-16 11:59:48 +0100 Riccardo Mottola via maintainers >

Re: ICU update

Hi Riccardo, Am 20.02.2018 um 18:22 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > On 2018-02-20 13:10:51 +0100 Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > >> Sure. >> # Wrong return code of test TestEnumSet on Solaris 9, skip testsuite for now >> SKIPTEST-5.9 = 1 >> SKIPTEST ?=

Re: mgar stuck applying patch

Hi Jake, Am 03.01.2018 um 04:31 schrieb Jake Goerzen : > I have a recipe I can build unstable9x successfully, but on unstable9s it > gets stuck at applying patch… I can reproduce this. It looks like an issue in the gluecode during fork: unstable9s% pstack 27002 27002:

Re: OpenCSW 10th Anniversary Camp

Hi Riccardo, Am 22.01.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > Laurent Blume via maintainers wrote: >> A camp with more beer and less Solaris? >> Count me in! > > But some hacking would be fun nevertheless?? Of course! >> I'm good for Dublin,

Re: 10th Anniversary Camp!

Hi Ben, > Am 24.09.2018 um 14:10 schrieb Ben Walton via maintainers > : > > Bumping this thread. > > The doc hasn't seen much activity in terms of driving an agenda, so now that > we're closer, let's get that done so we ensure we use the time well. > > Also, please note in the doc whether

Re: issue with bogus override

> Am 20.01.2019 um 18:07 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers > : > > Hi! > > > I am updating the gnustep base package. > > Little changed, except the new version. > > > When I build it, I get this: > > > * File root/opt/csw/GNUstep/System/Library/Libraries/gnustep- >

Re: Issue with non-existing package

Hi Riccaardo, Am 03.12.2018 um 12:09 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > let us take the "strong" route, remove traces of Performance, re-upload it > again. > > Sorry for the delay, the last time I tried there were issues with the > catalog, now I retried. > > Maciej (Matchek)

Re: Issue with non-existing package

Hi Riccardo, Am 06.12.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > perhaps there is also a permission issue? I think I need to repeat this for > 5.9, since I still get: Probably. Ire moved that also: dam@login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/gar/v2/lib/python > ./safe_remove_package.py

Re: Issue with non-existing package

Hi Riccardo, > Am 06.12.2018 um 12:51 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > > Hi Dagobert! > > > thank you, now, at least, I can rebuild the packages without getting > conflicts with itself! :) > > Maybe talso the SunOS5.11 catalogs need to be purged? Done: dam@login

Re: issue uploading packages / service unavailable

Hi Riccardo, Am 09.12.2018 um 22:23 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > I am trying since Friday to upload the performance packages again and I get > this: > > rmottola@login [login]:~/pkgs > csw-upload-pkg > performance-0.5.0\,REV\=2018.12.06-SunOS5.* > /opt/csw/bin/csw-upload-pkg

Re: migrate OSQA to static

Hi folks, Am 28.01.2019 um 14:08 schrieb cgrzemba--- via maintainers : > On 25.01.19 16:44, Maciej Bliziński wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:05:33PM +0100, cgrzemba--- via maintainers wrote: >> > I completed the work from weekend started in Dublin and the results are >> > here for review:

Re: Solaris 11.4

Hi Carsten, Am 23.10.2019 um 15:38 schrieb cgrzemba--- via maintainers : > do we have Solaris 11.4 (Sparc) build hosts? Nope, but I can activate the M10-1 from Dominique, I’ll see what I can do. Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by

Perl module dependency

Hi Peter, I have an issue with the recent update of Config::IniFiles because there has been an updated dependency to List::Util 1.33 whereas we currently ship 1.21 as part of CSWperl. Do you remember how we handled this in the past? Should we unbundle List::Util from CSWperl and update

Re: rebuilding gcc 4.8 on solaris 9

Hi Riccardo, Am 20.06.2020 um 16:02 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > I am attempting to rebuild gcc 4.8.4 on solaris 9 (we have a branch for that) > with the goal to get it to 4.8.5 then... This is probably due to sparcv8plus vs. sparcv8 but this is only guesswork from me.

Re: Remove old library

Hi, Am 29.12.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński via maintainers : > Setting a conflict sounds like a harsh way to do it. Maybe a softer approach > would suffice? We had a way of obsoleting packages, didn't we? > > http://wiki.opencsw.org/obsoleting-packages >

Re: built packages, where are they?

Hi Riccardo, Am 15.11.2021 um 01:38 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > I started upgrading some packages after a long time... I did "mgar platforms" > > ## ## # ## > ## ## # ## ## # > # ## # # ## # # > ## #

Re: built packages, where are they?

Hi Riccardo, Am 10.12.2021 um 13:07 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > And the packages are indeed there :) > > Inserting gnustep_make (i386 SunOS5.10) into catalog unstable i386 SunOS5.10 > Inserting gnustep_make (i386 SunOS5.10) into catalog unstable i386 SunOS5.11 > Inserting

Re: New Libevent Packages

Hi Ihsan, Am 11.02.2022 um 22:26 schrieb İhsan Doğan : > I thought these symlinks shouldn‘t be part of the dev package: > > 1 s none /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libevent.so=libevent-2.1.so.7.0.1 > 1 s none /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libevent_core.so=libevent_core-2.1.so.7.0.1 > 1 s none

Re: New Libevent Packages

Hi Ihsan, Am 11.02.2022 um 20:00 schrieb İhsan Doğan : > I’ve noticed, that I’ve made a mistake. If I look into the libevent_dev > package, there are some files, which shouldn’t be there. > > 1 s none /opt/csw/lib/libevent.so=libevent-2.1.so.7.0.1 > 1 s none

Re: New Libevent Packages

Hi Ihsan, Am 10.02.2022 um 16:19 schrieb İhsan Doğan via maintainers : > I’ve updated libevent to 2.1.7 and created a new package: > libevent2_1_7-2.1.12 CSWlibevent2-1-7 > > In order not to break the packages that are linked against CSWlibevent2-0-5, > I will leave CSWlibevent2-0-5 in the

Re: New Libevent Packages

Hi Ihsan, Am 10.02.2022 um 22:15 schrieb İhsan Doğan : >> Am 10.02.2022 um 16:54 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen : >>> I’ve updated libevent to 2.1.7 and created a new package: >>> libevent2_1_7-2.1.12 CSWlibevent2-1-7 >>> >>> In order not to break the packages that are linked against >>>

Re: freeciv version 2.6.9 and 3.0.7

Hi Jake, > Am 02.06.2023 um 17:48 schrieb Jake Goerzen via maintainers > : > > I have 2 versions of the same package freeciv version 2.6.9 and 3.0.7. > Both branches are actively maintained upstream for security fixes. I thought > it would be good to release both into the catalog. Should