Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.11: Planned for the 28th of Feb, 2018
On 02/19/2018 09:16 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed >> details for 3.10.11 >> >> Release date: 28th Feb, 2018 > Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns, > > 1) Reviews, > - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/ > - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/ > > Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or > smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail. > > @Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them. Reminder, release tagging is 2 days from now. ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.11: Planned for the 28th of Feb, 2018
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:26 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Shyam Ranganathan > wrote: > >> On 01/30/2018 02:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed >> > details for 3.10.11 >> > >> > Release date: 28th Feb, 2018 >> >> Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns, >> >> 1) Reviews, >> - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/ >> - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/ >> >> Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or >> smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail. >> >> @Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them. >> >> 2) @Hari, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19553/ seems to be failing >> consistently in the test, ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t please take a >> look, as this patch is important from an upgrade perspective. >> > > atin@dhcp35-96:~/codebase/upstream/glusterfs_master/glusterfs$ git log > tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t > commit 858fae39936e5aee5ea4e3816a10ba310d04cf61 > Author: Amar Tumballi > Date: Mon Nov 27 23:56:50 2017 +0530 > > tests: mark currently failing regression tests as known issues > > Change-Id: If6c36dc6c395730dfb17b5b4df6f24629d904926 > BUG: 1517961 > Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi > > FWIW, this test is marked as bad in master. Should we mark it bad in > release-3.12 as well? > s/release-3.12/release-3.10/g > > >> > Tracker bug for blockers: >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11 >> > >> > Shyam >> > ___ >> > Gluster-devel mailing list >> > gluster-de...@gluster.org >> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > >> ___ >> maintainers mailing list >> maintainers@gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >> > > ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.11: Planned for the 28th of Feb, 2018
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 01/30/2018 02:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed > > details for 3.10.11 > > > > Release date: 28th Feb, 2018 > > Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns, > > 1) Reviews, > - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/ > - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/ > > Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or > smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail. > > @Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them. > > 2) @Hari, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19553/ seems to be failing > consistently in the test, ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t please take a > look, as this patch is important from an upgrade perspective. > atin@dhcp35-96:~/codebase/upstream/glusterfs_master/glusterfs$ git log tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t commit 858fae39936e5aee5ea4e3816a10ba310d04cf61 Author: Amar Tumballi Date: Mon Nov 27 23:56:50 2017 +0530 tests: mark currently failing regression tests as known issues Change-Id: If6c36dc6c395730dfb17b5b4df6f24629d904926 BUG: 1517961 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi FWIW, this test is marked as bad in master. Should we mark it bad in release-3.12 as well? > > Tracker bug for blockers: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11 > > > > Shyam > > ___ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > gluster-de...@gluster.org > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.11: Planned for the 28th of Feb, 2018
On 01/30/2018 02:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed > details for 3.10.11 > > Release date: 28th Feb, 2018 Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns, 1) Reviews, - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/ - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/ Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail. @Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them. 2) @Hari, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19553/ seems to be failing consistently in the test, ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t please take a look, as this patch is important from an upgrade perspective. > Tracker bug for blockers: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11 > > Shyam > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > gluster-de...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers