Michael Schwern wrote:
! No - please do not bother. F$parse() is enough of a wrapper around
! sys$parse that if it cannot provide an extra layer of de-obfuscation
! then there may be no point in taking matters any further.
!
!Yes, I seems less complicated to just use Perl. Hopefully I can
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VMS (non-perl) File::Spec-catfile equivalent?
prefix=DKB100:[NOUVOUS_PERL.
This is invalid syntax ANYWAY, if [ is used ] should be used
if is used should be used or VMS will complain about an
invalid directory syntax.
just my .02
regards,
Nico Baggus
prefix=DKB100:[NOUVOUS_PERL.
This is invalid syntax ANYWAY, if [ is used ] should be used
if is used should be used or VMS will complain about an
invalid directory syntax.
just my .02
regards,
Nico Baggus
-
ATTENTION:
The
The bit which bothers me is the adequate for at least 85-99% of
usage. It's gotta be 100% (less stupid user input).
I'll apply Craig's original patch, mod my little changes. It's slow,
but it's complete and I know it works.
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05439.html
So I'm going to punt on this one
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:51:12AM -0800, John Boucher wrote:
Well I'm a VMS guy, but I don't know what catfile does. I'll see what I can
find out about it, but I'd also like to know what you need it to do.
Given the following (or some variation on the following)
volume:[some.dir]
John Boucher wrote:
This of course will not work if the values aren't formatted as expected,
i.e. rather than [], missing or extra dots, missing colons, etc.
VMS doesn't have a built-in catfile, and F$PARSE won't correct for help
with
the punctuation.
A routine I have to take a file
