Timothy Mallon wrote:
At what historical moment was anything of the kind first thought? It
doesn't match anything I have read in classical or other pre-modern
authors; it seems to me a product of the socio-economic alienation of
the intellectual. (Only an intellectual could envisage the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Timothy Mallon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
At what historical moment was anything of the kind first thought? It
doesn't match anything I have read in classical or other pre-modern
authors; it seems to me a product of the socio-economic alienation of
the intellectual.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Neven Jovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The easy solution, or interpretation, of G. 1,388 would be to read
_crow's s's_--and C's and H--as the sound of _sand_, harena:
et Sola in SiCCa SeCum Spatiatur Harena
There probably are strong reasons to resolutely reject
There can be no doubt that there is a great difference between the social
and economic conditions for patronage in antiquity and for more modern
critics; and the a priori notion that the poets' rightful place is in
opposition to the establishment does seem to be characteristically modern.
On the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip Thibodeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
There can be no doubt that there is a great difference between the social
and economic conditions for patronage in antiquity and for more modern
critics; and the a priori notion that the poets' rightful place is in
opposition
