[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When this was described to MapInfo recently in a meeting as "Buffering
> doesn't work," a lead employee defended Pro by saying, "It works, just not
> in the cosmetic layer." I got the impression that MapInfo was in no hurry
> to release a bug fix as long as there was a w
At 12:27 PM 12/08/1999 +0100, Mats Elfström wrote:
>A while ago there was a thread concerning the default lat/long behaviour
>of the cosmetic layer.
>I have just experienced a weird behaviour of the standard buffer tool
>when using the cosmetic layer as recipient for the buffer.
>The *seed* table
Hi All!
A while ago there was a thread concerning the default lat/long behaviour
of the cosmetic layer.
I have just experienced a weird behaviour of the standard buffer tool
when using the cosmetic layer as recipient for the buffer.
The *seed* table is in a Swedish coordinate system with 7 digit
