ly fashion, let's try to address that...
This is interesting. Do you aware any means to do that? Thanks!
Regards,
Kai
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Wang [mailto:andrew.w...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 2:22 PM
To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com>
Cc: Jun
Hi Junping,
Thank you for making 2.8.2 happen and now planning the 2.8.3 release.
I have an ask, is it convenient to include the back port work for OSS connector
module? We have some Hadoop users that wish to have it by default for
convenience, though in the past they used it by back porting
Cool to have this feature! Thanks Jian and all.
Regards,
Kai
-Original Message-
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [mailto:vino...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2017 7:20 AM
To: Jian He
Cc: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; Hdfs-dev
Thanks Vinod.
>> Of the top of my head, one of the biggest areas is application
>> compatibility. When folks move from 2.x to 3.x, are their apps binary
>> compatible? Source compatible? Or need changes?
I thought these are good concerns from overall perspective. On the other hand,
I've
Thanks Sammi.
My non-binding +1 to make the release candidate.
Regards,
Kai
-Original Message-
From: Chen, Sammi
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 4:59 PM
To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com>; Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>;
Arun Suresh <asur...@apache.
For the leveldb thing, wouldn't we have an alternative option in Java for the
platforms where leveldb isn't supported yet due to whatever reasons. IMO,
native library would be best to be used for optimization and production for
performance. For development and pure Java platform, by default
My humble feeling is almost the same regarding the urgent need of a 3.0 alpha
release.
Considering EC, shell-script rewriting and etc. are significant changes and
there are interested users that want to evaluate EC storage method, an alpha
3.0 release will definitely help a lot allowing users
Thanks Andrew for driving this. Wonder if it's a good chance for HADOOP-12579
(Deprecate and remove WriteableRPCEngine) to be in. Note it's not an
incompatible change, but feel better to be done in the major release.
Regards,
Kai
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Wang
Hi Allen,
This sounds great.
Naming a patch foo-HDFS-7285.00.patch should get tested on the HDFS-7285
branch.
Does it happen locally in developer's machine when running test-patch.sh, or
also mean something in Hadoop Jenkins building when a JIRA becoming patch
available? Thanks.
Regards,
Might I have some comments for this, just providing my thought. Thanks.
If we start now, it might make it out by 2016. If we start now,
downstreamers can start aligning themselves to land versions that suit at
about the same time.
Not only for down streamers to align with the long term
Kumar Vavilapalli [mailto:vino...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:31 AM
To: Zheng, Kai
Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Common;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.7 status
Kai, please ping the reviewers that were already looking
JDK8 support is in the consideration, looks like many issues were reported and
resolved already.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11090
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Wang [mailto:andrew.w...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:20 AM
To:
Sorry for the bad. I thought it was sending to my colleagues.
By the way, for the JDK8 support, we (Intel) would like to investigate further
and help, thanks.
Regards,
Kai
-Original Message-
From: Zheng, Kai
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:49 AM
To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org
Is it interested to get the following issues in the release ? Thanks !
HADOOP-10670
HADOOP-10671
Regards,
Kai
-Original Message-
From: Yongjun Zhang [mailto:yzh...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 4:46 AM
To: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli; Hadoop
14 matches
Mail list logo