Build fails with ant 1.7.0 but works with 1.8.0
---
Key: MAPREDUCE-2940
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2940
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/853/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 9903 lines...]
[exec] depbase=`echo
In secure mode RM WebUI shows wrong user for application
Key: MAPREDUCE-2941
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2941
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Issue Type: Bug
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/854/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 9903 lines...]
[exec] depbase=`echo
Hi Venu,
Please go ahead and provide patches for them - I'll review.
thanks,
Arun
On Sep 5, 2011, at 9:47 PM, Venu Gopala Rao wrote:
Hi Matt,
The following defects are important defects encountered by us in our
regular Hadoop usage. We have submitted patches to these defects in the
Gang,
I'm starting to go through the PA queue and review stuff. Unfortunately a lot
of patches have gone stale due to recent merge of MR-279 and code restructuring
for maven. If you guys can rebase I promise to review all I can soon-ish and
commit appropriately. I'll use a fair bar for 0.23
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Harsh J resolved MAPREDUCE-2068.
Resolution: Not A Problem
Thanks for checking in Arun,
Marking as resolved.
Not a problem
Thanks Arun, I'll rebase/reimpl the ones where its necessary.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Also, I'll start to punt patches which only make sense for 'classic'
MapReduce with MRv2 committed. Makes sense?
I'm fine with this, and would like it if you
TestNMAuditLogger.testNMAuditLoggerWithIP failing
-
Key: MAPREDUCE-2942
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2942
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Issue Type: Bug
Hbase Batch Import Insertion Method
---
Key: MAPREDUCE-2945
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2945
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Issue Type: Task
Components: examples
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Harsh J resolved MAPREDUCE-2945.
Resolution: Invalid
Arsalan,
The Apache JIRA is for filing issues or opening discussion
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/809/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 9393 lines...]
[ivy:resolve] -- artifact
There are a bunch of so called tools in hadoop-mapreduce-project/src/tools -
DistCp, HadoopArchives, Rumen etc. And contrib projects are in src/contrib
in all of common, hdfs and mapred source trees. Not sure how the distinction
was ever made.
The last time we had a discussion about moving
Do we still want/need to do this?
Thanks.
Alejandro
TaskTrackers fail at startup
Key: MAPREDUCE-2946
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2946
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Issue Type: Bug
Components: tasktracker
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Owen O'Malley resolved MAPREDUCE-2946.
--
Resolution: Invalid
I forgot to chmod the task-controller to setuid. Sorry for the
Yes,
I think we need this, both for 0.23 and 0.24. The current form of build is
causing a lot of issues. Folks are not aware of checking ant after running
maven and unknowingly break the builds.
thanks
mahadev
On Sep 7, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
Do we still want/need to
+1 for doing this. I am willing to help too. But I think we should be
discussing about tools and contrib separately from this ticket (which is how
you started that issue BTW).
OTOH, this fixes only one part of the remaining bits. I've been seeing
first-hand from people working on some of the
Sort fails on YARN+MR with lots of task failures
Key: MAPREDUCE-2947
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2947
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Agreed, we should not have a dumping ground. IMO, what it would go into
hadoop-tools (i.e. distcp, streaming and someone could argue for FsShell as
well) are effectively hadoop CLI utilities. Having them in a separate module
rather in than in the core module (common, hdfs, mapreduce) does not mean
Folks,
Has the community decided how long MRv1 will remain part of the codebase,
after 0.23 ? The reason I am asking is, for those who are working on
forward porting LinuxTaskController fixes (from 0.20.2xx) to 0.22, will
they have to patch 0.23 and trunk as well ? Or should these branches be
I like the idea of having tools as a seperate module and I dont think
that it will be a dumping ground unless we choose to make one of it.
+1 for hadoop tools module under trunk.
thanks
mahadev
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Agreed, we should not
+1 for separate hadoop-tools module. However, if a tool is broken at
release time, and no one comes forward to fix it, it should be removed.
(i.e. Unlike contrib modules, where build and test failures were
tolerated.)
- milind
On 9/7/11 11:27 AM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I
Makes sense
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:32 AM, milind.bhandar...@emc.com wrote:
+1 for separate hadoop-tools module. However, if a tool is broken at
release time, and no one comes forward to fix it, it should be removed.
(i.e. Unlike contrib modules, where build and test failures were
My understanding is that the MR1 code is currently needed to run the tests
because there is no Mini MR cluster for MR2. So the code is needed until
the tests can run against MR2 (not sure if there's an effort underway).
However, see MR-2736, if we remove the ability to run the daemons I don't
Hadoop streaming test failure, post MR-2767
---
Key: MAPREDUCE-2948
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2948
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/855/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 9903 lines...]
[exec] g++
There is a MiniYarnCluster and a MiniMRYarnCluster, it is just that the tests
have not been ported over to use them yet.
--Bobby
On 9/7/11 2:01 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
My understanding is that the MR1 code is currently needed to run the tests
because there is no Mini MR
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-22-branch/67/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 2258 lines...]
A
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/856/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 9902 lines...]
[exec] depbase=`echo
Is there a jira for that? Seems like most tests wouldn't be MR1 specific.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Robert Evans ev...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
There is a MiniYarnCluster and a MiniMRYarnCluster, it is just that the tests
have not been ported over to use them yet.
--Bobby
On 9/7/11 2:01
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/857/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 9902 lines...]
[exec] depbase=`echo
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/858/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 9902 lines...]
[exec] depbase=`echo
Does a separate hadoop-tools module imply that there will be a separate Jenkins
build as well?
Thanks,
Joep
From: Alejandro Abdelnur [t...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:35 AM
To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hadoop
It is good to have hadoop-tools module separately. But as I asked before we
need to answer some questions here. I'm trying to answer them myself. Comments
are welcome.
1. Should the patches for tools be created against Hadoop Common?
Here, I meant should Hadoop common mailing list be used Or
35 matches
Mail list logo
