Re: DISCUSS: Hadoop Compatability Guidelines

2017-09-07 Thread Steve Loughran

On 7 Sep 2017, at 19:13, Daniel Templeton 
> wrote:

Good point.  I think it would be valuable to enumerate the policies around the 
versioned state stores.  We have the three you listed. We should probably 
include the HDFS fsimage in that list.  Any others?


S3Guard now stores state in DDB. we do have a version marker & A policy written 
down of how upgrades are done

https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/src/site/markdown/tools/hadoop-aws/s3guard.md



I also want to add a section that clarifies when it's OK to change the 
visibility or audience of an API.

Daniel

On 9/5/17 11:04 AM, Arun Suresh wrote:
Thanks for starting this Daniel.

I think we should also add a section for store compatibility (all state
stores including RM, NM, Federation etc.). Essentially an explicit policy
detailing when is it ok to change the major and minor versions and how it
should relate to the hadoop release version.
Thoughts ?

Cheers
-Arun


On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Daniel Templeton 
>
wrote:

Good idea.  I should have thought of that. :)  Done.

Daniel


On 9/5/17 10:33 AM, Anu Engineer wrote:

Could you please attach the PDFs to the JIRA. I think the mailer is
stripping them off from the mail.

Thanks
Anu





On 9/5/17, 9:44 AM, "Daniel Templeton" 
> wrote:

Resending with a broader audience, and reattaching the PDFs.
Daniel

On 9/4/17 9:01 AM, Daniel Templeton wrote:

All, in prep for Hadoop 3 beta 1 I've been working on updating the
compatibility guidelines on HADOOP-13714.  I think the initial doc is
more or less complete, so I'd like to open the discussion up to the
broader Hadoop community.

In the new guidelines, I have drawn some lines in the sand regarding
compatibility between releases.  In some cases these lines are more
restrictive than the current practices.  The intent with the new
guidelines is not to limit progress by restricting what goes into a
release, but rather to drive release numbering to keep in line with
the reality of the code.

Please have a read and provide feedback on the JIRA.  I'm sure there
are more than a couple of areas that could be improved.  If you'd
rather not read markdown from a diff patch, I've attached PDFs of the
two modified docs.

Thanks!
Daniel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: 
yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: 
yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org




Re: DISCUSS: Hadoop Compatability Guidelines

2017-09-07 Thread Daniel Templeton
Good point.  I think it would be valuable to enumerate the policies 
around the versioned state stores.  We have the three you listed. We 
should probably include the HDFS fsimage in that list.  Any others?


I also want to add a section that clarifies when it's OK to change the 
visibility or audience of an API.


Daniel

On 9/5/17 11:04 AM, Arun Suresh wrote:

Thanks for starting this Daniel.

I think we should also add a section for store compatibility (all state
stores including RM, NM, Federation etc.). Essentially an explicit policy
detailing when is it ok to change the major and minor versions and how it
should relate to the hadoop release version.
Thoughts ?

Cheers
-Arun


On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Daniel Templeton 
wrote:


Good idea.  I should have thought of that. :)  Done.

Daniel


On 9/5/17 10:33 AM, Anu Engineer wrote:


Could you please attach the PDFs to the JIRA. I think the mailer is
stripping them off from the mail.

Thanks
Anu





On 9/5/17, 9:44 AM, "Daniel Templeton"  wrote:

Resending with a broader audience, and reattaching the PDFs.

Daniel

On 9/4/17 9:01 AM, Daniel Templeton wrote:


All, in prep for Hadoop 3 beta 1 I've been working on updating the
compatibility guidelines on HADOOP-13714.  I think the initial doc is
more or less complete, so I'd like to open the discussion up to the
broader Hadoop community.

In the new guidelines, I have drawn some lines in the sand regarding
compatibility between releases.  In some cases these lines are more
restrictive than the current practices.  The intent with the new
guidelines is not to limit progress by restricting what goes into a
release, but rather to drive release numbering to keep in line with
the reality of the code.

Please have a read and provide feedback on the JIRA.  I'm sure there
are more than a couple of areas that could be improved.  If you'd
rather not read markdown from a diff patch, I've attached PDFs of the
two modified docs.

Thanks!
Daniel




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org



Re: DISCUSS: Hadoop Compatability Guidelines

2017-09-05 Thread Arun Suresh
Thanks for starting this Daniel.

I think we should also add a section for store compatibility (all state
stores including RM, NM, Federation etc.). Essentially an explicit policy
detailing when is it ok to change the major and minor versions and how it
should relate to the hadoop release version.
Thoughts ?

Cheers
-Arun


On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Daniel Templeton 
wrote:

> Good idea.  I should have thought of that. :)  Done.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 9/5/17 10:33 AM, Anu Engineer wrote:
>
>> Could you please attach the PDFs to the JIRA. I think the mailer is
>> stripping them off from the mail.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Anu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/5/17, 9:44 AM, "Daniel Templeton"  wrote:
>>
>> Resending with a broader audience, and reattaching the PDFs.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On 9/4/17 9:01 AM, Daniel Templeton wrote:
>>>
 All, in prep for Hadoop 3 beta 1 I've been working on updating the
 compatibility guidelines on HADOOP-13714.  I think the initial doc is
 more or less complete, so I'd like to open the discussion up to the
 broader Hadoop community.

 In the new guidelines, I have drawn some lines in the sand regarding
 compatibility between releases.  In some cases these lines are more
 restrictive than the current practices.  The intent with the new
 guidelines is not to limit progress by restricting what goes into a
 release, but rather to drive release numbering to keep in line with
 the reality of the code.

 Please have a read and provide feedback on the JIRA.  I'm sure there
 are more than a couple of areas that could be improved.  If you'd
 rather not read markdown from a diff patch, I've attached PDFs of the
 two modified docs.

 Thanks!
 Daniel

>>>
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>
>


Re: DISCUSS: Hadoop Compatability Guidelines

2017-09-05 Thread Daniel Templeton

Good idea.  I should have thought of that. :)  Done.

Daniel

On 9/5/17 10:33 AM, Anu Engineer wrote:

Could you please attach the PDFs to the JIRA. I think the mailer is stripping 
them off from the mail.

Thanks
Anu





On 9/5/17, 9:44 AM, "Daniel Templeton"  wrote:


Resending with a broader audience, and reattaching the PDFs.

Daniel

On 9/4/17 9:01 AM, Daniel Templeton wrote:

All, in prep for Hadoop 3 beta 1 I've been working on updating the
compatibility guidelines on HADOOP-13714.  I think the initial doc is
more or less complete, so I'd like to open the discussion up to the
broader Hadoop community.

In the new guidelines, I have drawn some lines in the sand regarding
compatibility between releases.  In some cases these lines are more
restrictive than the current practices.  The intent with the new
guidelines is not to limit progress by restricting what goes into a
release, but rather to drive release numbering to keep in line with
the reality of the code.

Please have a read and provide feedback on the JIRA.  I'm sure there
are more than a couple of areas that could be improved.  If you'd
rather not read markdown from a diff patch, I've attached PDFs of the
two modified docs.

Thanks!
Daniel





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org



Re: DISCUSS: Hadoop Compatability Guidelines

2017-09-05 Thread Anu Engineer
Could you please attach the PDFs to the JIRA. I think the mailer is stripping 
them off from the mail.

Thanks
Anu





On 9/5/17, 9:44 AM, "Daniel Templeton"  wrote:

>Resending with a broader audience, and reattaching the PDFs.
>
>Daniel
>
>On 9/4/17 9:01 AM, Daniel Templeton wrote:
>> All, in prep for Hadoop 3 beta 1 I've been working on updating the 
>> compatibility guidelines on HADOOP-13714.  I think the initial doc is 
>> more or less complete, so I'd like to open the discussion up to the 
>> broader Hadoop community.
>>
>> In the new guidelines, I have drawn some lines in the sand regarding 
>> compatibility between releases.  In some cases these lines are more 
>> restrictive than the current practices.  The intent with the new 
>> guidelines is not to limit progress by restricting what goes into a 
>> release, but rather to drive release numbering to keep in line with 
>> the reality of the code.
>>
>> Please have a read and provide feedback on the JIRA.  I'm sure there 
>> are more than a couple of areas that could be improved.  If you'd 
>> rather not read markdown from a diff patch, I've attached PDFs of the 
>> two modified docs.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Daniel
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org


Re: DISCUSS: Hadoop Compatability Guidelines

2017-09-05 Thread Daniel Templeton

Resending with a broader audience, and reattaching the PDFs.

Daniel

On 9/4/17 9:01 AM, Daniel Templeton wrote:
All, in prep for Hadoop 3 beta 1 I've been working on updating the 
compatibility guidelines on HADOOP-13714.  I think the initial doc is 
more or less complete, so I'd like to open the discussion up to the 
broader Hadoop community.


In the new guidelines, I have drawn some lines in the sand regarding 
compatibility between releases.  In some cases these lines are more 
restrictive than the current practices.  The intent with the new 
guidelines is not to limit progress by restricting what goes into a 
release, but rather to drive release numbering to keep in line with 
the reality of the code.


Please have a read and provide feedback on the JIRA.  I'm sure there 
are more than a couple of areas that could be improved.  If you'd 
rather not read markdown from a diff patch, I've attached PDFs of the 
two modified docs.


Thanks!
Daniel




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org