[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-6754) Container Ids for a yarn application should be monotonically increasing in the scope of the application

Srikanth Sampath created MAPREDUCE-6754: --- Summary: Container Ids for a yarn application should be monotonically increasing in the scope of the application Key: MAPREDUCE-6754 URL:

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

Thanks everyone for the discussion! Based on what has been said in this thread, I will move forward on the preparation efforts (working with Sangjin and the community) for a 2.6.5 release. If there is a strong objection to this, please let us know. I see three initial tasks going forward: 1. Fix

[DISCUSS] Release cadence and EOL

Forking off this discussion from 2.6.5 release thread. Junping and Chris T have brought up important concerns regarding too many concurrent releases and the lack of EOL for our releases. First up, it would be nice to hear from others on our releases having the notion of EOL and other

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86

For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/131/ [Aug 12, 2016 7:05:52 AM] (kai.zheng) HADOOP-11588. Benchmark framework and test for erasure coders. [Aug 11, 2016 6:57:43 PM] (weichiu) HADOOP-13441. Document LdapGroupsMapping keystore password

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

I am OK with going forward for 2.6.5 release given some people may not be ready for migration to 2.7 and we have done some preparation work already. Thanks Chris for pushing the release work forward! About future releases of 2.6 (after 2.6.5) or any other legacy releases, I think it worth more

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.3 RC1

Hi all, I've created a release candidate RC1 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.3. As discussed before, this is the next maintenance release to follow up 2.7.2. The RC is available for validation at: http://home.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.3-RC1/ The

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

You might want the snapshot bug fix done in HDFS-7056. This bug creates snapshot filediffs even if you never use snapshot. For 2.6, we will have to do it in a separate jira to pick up the fix only. Related to this, HDFS-9696 might be of interest too. Kihwal From: Chris Trezzo

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

Thanks folks for opening up the discussion on our EOL policy. That's also exactly what I wanted to discuss when I opened up the 2.6.5 discussion: I also want to gauge the community's interest in maintaining the 2.6.x > line. How long do we maintain this line? What would be a sensible EOL >