I'm adding my +1 (binding) to conclude the vote.
With 13 +1's (11 binding) and no -1's, the vote passes. We'll get on with
the merge to trunk shortly. Thanks everyone!
Regards
Vrushali
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:54 AM, varunsax...@apache.org <
varun.saxena.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
Thanks Brahma for comment on this thread. To be clear, I always update branch
version just before RC kicking off.
For 2.8.2 release, I don't have plan to involve big top or other third-party
test tools. As always, we will rely on test/verify efforts from community
especially from large
Hi Andrew,
We have completed the merge of TSv2 to trunk.
You can now go ahead with the branching.
Regards,
Varun Saxena.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> Sure. Ping me when the TSv2 goes in, and I can take care of branching.
>
> We're still
For more details, see
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/508/
[Aug 29, 2017 11:21:14 AM] (sunilg) YARN-6386. Show decommissioning nodes in
new YARN UI. Contributed by
[Aug 29, 2017 11:36:22 AM] (aajisaka) HADOOP-14671. Upgrade to Apache Yetus
0.5.0.
[Aug 29, 2017
Haibo Chen created MAPREDUCE-6948:
-
Summary: TestJobImpl.testUnusableNodeTransition failed
Key: MAPREDUCE-6948
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6948
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Haibo Chen resolved MAPREDUCE-6949.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
> yarn.app.mapreduce.am.log.level is not documented in
Haibo Chen created MAPREDUCE-6949:
-
Summary: yarn.app.mapreduce.am.log.level is not documented in
mapred-default.xml
Key: MAPREDUCE-6949
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6949
I'd have assumed it would have gone in as one single patch, rather than a full
history. I don't see why the trunk needs all the evolutionary history of a
build.
What should our policy/process be here?
I do currently plan to merge the s3guard in as one single squashed patch; just
getting
Thanks Sangjin for the link to the previous discussions on this! I think
that helps answer Steve's questions.
As decided on that thread [1], YARN-5355 as a feature branch was merged to
trunk via "git merge --no-ff" .
Although trunk already had TSv2 code (alpha1) prior to this merge, we chose
to
The "git" way of doing things would be to rebase the feature branch on
master (trunk) and then commit the patch stack.
Squashing the entire feature into a 10 MB megapatch is the "svn" way of
doing things.
The svn workflow evolved because merging feature branches back to trunk
was really painful
I recall this discussion about a couple of years ago:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43cd65c6b6c3c0e8ac2b3c76afd9eff1f78b177fabe9c4a96d9b3d0b@1440189889@%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Steve Loughran
wrote:
> I'd have assumed it
11 matches
Mail list logo