Hi all,
I'm encountering the same problem.
What happens actually is that the capabilities tell that the online
resource for the legend points to the url I set in
wms_style_[style’s_name]_legendurl_href.
[...]
Style
NameMyStyle/Name
TitleMyStyle/Title
LegendURL
I'm using qgis 1.9 from a while back (before the vector branch merge). It
shows wms layer names in the maplegend (toc).
As to arcgis server it now has an option to use layer names as they appear
in the map project, effectively making names equal to the titles, even if
illegal. But seriously, I
Hi: we have a MapServer OWS instance which we use to disseminate
observations via WMS and WFS/SOS.
One of our layers has 1 million records (PostGIS backend). The layer
has CLASS level EXPRESSION objects for WMS visualization/classification.
We initially implemented a LAYER level FILTER, however
Steve: thanks for the info. Good point. It would help, however the client
would require apriori knowledge, which won't help in our case because we want
things more generic.
Of course, there's always MapScript (i.e. set LAYER.FILTER only if it's a WMS
GetMap/GetFeatureInfo request), but I was
Does runtime substitution can help?
You could post latest_observation=1 when calling the wms and 0 and 1 when
using the wfs
the filter would be latest_observation in (%param%)
Kralidis,Tom [Ontario] tom.krali...@ec.gc.ca@lists.osgeo.org
Envoyé par : mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Could you use script wrappers to set different environment variables
Eg a wms file and a wfs file
Your WMS file
#!/bin/sh
MS_MAPFILE=/path/to/mapfile
export MS_MAPFILE
export LATEST_OBS=1
/cgi-bin/mapserv
WFS File
#!/bin/sh
Hi Michael: thanks. That definitely works, thanks (although that means
managing two endpoints downstream, but I'm starting to think I'm asking too
much here :)
Thanks
..Tom
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH
[mailto:michael.sm...@usace.army.mil]
Sent: June
As to arcgis server it now has an option to use layer names
as they appear
in the map project, effectively making names equal to the
titles, even if
illegal. But seriously, I can't imagine why this restriction
is in the wms
spec... seems archaic to me...
Seems you never read it... It's
On 06/12/2013 14:23, Kralidis,Tom [Ontario] wrote:
Hi: we have a MapServer OWS instance which we use to disseminate
observations via WMS and WFS/SOS.
One of our layers has 1 million records (PostGIS backend). The layer
has CLASS level EXPRESSION objects for WMS visualization/classification.
We
Andreas,
Very informative. Thanks. I've never read the spec in its entirety, just
some parts as need arises. The concept of having strings for humans and
strings for machines does not resonate well for me... but I'm not bashing
the spec just airing some perplexity.
Your answer really presented
All,
So, I'm setting up a new install of GeoMoose (among other things, read on) and
wondering about where the services abstraction ideas are currently at? While I
know PHP is popular, I much prefer PERL for the services side of things.
I would like to use PERL in place of PHP for example. I
Oops, wrong list. Can I blame in on Outlook??
Sorry all.
Bobb
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
All (and Tb),
Ok, I got the Leaders to work. But now have a few other questions/comments . .
. mostly related to label/leader/feature stacking order and how to control it.
I know that most of the examples are against polygons and my questions are
related to Points (and probably some line
I'm looking at implementing RFC 74 Includes from non-file connections, i.e.,
using a database query to bring in a section of mapfile, as an alternative to
the INCLUDE filename that's in there already.
Some interesting and powerful capabilities hinted at in the RFC, such as,
A common use case
On 6/12/2013 5:20 PM, Robert Hollingsworth wrote:
I'm looking at implementing RFC 74 Includes from non-file connections,
i.e., using a database query to bring in a section of mapfile, as an
alternative to the INCLUDE /filename/ that's in there already.
Some interesting and powerful capabilities
Robert,
I've commented on this one in the past here in the list.
My thought was to add in the capability of passing a URL through the INCLUDE,
the URL(could be limited to the same domain, but wouldn't need to be) would
simply hand back a Mapfile fragment. An example would be something like:
16 matches
Mail list logo