The AMD and Intel x86_64 chips are quite similar, and most optimisations
If I'm not mistaken I think the 64bit instruction set AMD developed
was adopted by Intel so this would make sense.
The Work with Intel probably refers to the fact that Intel is helping the
work by donating many-core
Does the following item under the Performance section indicate
optimizations for AMD chips are not being added?
Better multi CPU performance above 16 cores (Work with Intel)
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to :
I don't know if the following comments are useful but here goes...
Here is the picture of this attempt
Looks nice.
For those who have familiar the 5.2 MSI installer already, what I have
added is a checkbox Standard configuration, explanation text, and
For those that aren't familiar or are
That's it :-)
Thanks for the update. It's good to read about what some of the core
members are doing to evangelize in the community.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
The machine running the buildbot adutko-centos-amd64 experienced a
hardware failure last night around 1AM EST (UTC 0600). I believe it is
the motherboard and due to funding constraints I am not certain when
it will be brought back online. I will make an attempt to migrate the
buildbot when I have
Should be clean now. I also restarted the buildbot after cleaning.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help :
Sorry about adutko-centos5-amd64 being down. I've not finished
changes to my monitoring script to tell me when a builder is offline.
I'll try to get that done soon and send it to the list when I've
updated it to work with the new buildbot status page format.
My notification script was going haywire and then I realized you were
doing the upgrade. :-) Nice new interface! Good stuff.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
Sorry for the delayed notice but adutko-centos5-amd64 will probably be
offline until Wednesday (11/24/10) awaiting a part replacement.
-Adam
http://buildbot.askmonty.org/buildbot/buildslaves/adutko-centos5-amd64
___
Mailing list:
I'm sure you have all read
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mysqlatfacebook/mysqlatfacebook/tools/annotate/head:/osc/OnlineSchemaChange.php
already,
but if you haven't, it might be neat to look at evaluating and possibly
integrating it into MariaDB.
___
:)
Why?
When I think of a Butler I think of someone who monitors various aspects of
a household/estate, stashes that information and uses it to improve service.
Good idea. Indeed, it's important.
And to know if it's SSD or not.
Last night I was also thinking about network configuration.
So, Phone Home or MySQL feedback daemon or better name wanted
feature.
Maybe call it Butler ??? Just a thought...
Not unlike the Uptimes Project or Debian Popularity Contest.
Opt-in only with an easy disable option after opting in... correct?
The complete specs will be here:
Is the adutko-ultrasparc3 buildbot too slow? would it be missed?
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help :
Because of this, you need to do some changes on your buildbot hosts.
These are the slaves mariadb-brs and adutko-ultrasparc3.
(The slave adutko-centos5-amd64 does not need any changes, as it is not
using
bzr for the build).
Since I migrated the adutko-centos5-amd64 VM from Linode to a
These are the slaves mariadb-brs and adutko-ultrasparc3.
Both are running test builds of successful past builds to check
functionality of the upgrades.
1. make sure you are using at least bzr 1.16 (or better 2.x). If the bzr on
either slave is older, then you need to upgrade it.
Both
All of the buildbots I administrate should now be back online
(adutko-centos5-amd64, adutko-ultrasparc3 and mariadb-brs). Thank you for
your patience.
-Adam
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to :
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Kristian Nielsen
kniel...@knielsen-hq.orgwrote:
Colin Charles co...@askmonty.org writes:
On 25 Mar 2010, at 02:09, Daniel Bartholomew wrote:
If so, my thinking is that the first 5.2 release will be called
5.2.1
and then go up from there.
This is
Ah, but the thing is, MySQL will never (as far as we know/guess) release
5.2. MySQL 5.2, 6.0, 5.4, they've all been officially cancelled! Next
version
currently is planned as MySQL 5.5. So we squeezed into the spare room :)
Then why not move away from their versioning numbers but always
I've recently increased my down/up link to the Internet so checkouts should
be extremely fast. Builds on the hosts should obviously remain roughly the
same, but turnaround time due to download/upload bottlenecks should no
longer be an issue. The bots that should see an improvement are:
I might also add...
*What happens when/if Canonical/Ubuntu goes bunk?
Using all of the tools provided by one vendor can be a great thing but not
if the vendor's existence is tenuous. If that happens, how easy would it
be to migrate data away from the vendor and would we even have that option?
And the data is the important part... I think it's a good idea, but I am
just trying to bring up a counterpoint that might not have been discussed.
On Mar 15, 2010 9:08 AM, Timour Katchaounov tim...@askmonty.org wrote:
Adam,
I might also add...
*What happens when/if Canonical/Ubuntu goes
Eric,
Sorry for being dense...do you have a link so others can look at the
code?
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Michael Widenius mo...@askmonty.orgwrote:
Hi!
Eric == Eric Day e...@oddments.org writes:
Eric Hi Sergei!
Eric Like I mentioned, this will be a tool written in
.
On Jan 26, 2010 3:57 AM, Kristian Nielsen kniel...@knielsen-hq.org
wrote:
Adam M. Dutko dutko.a...@gmail.com writes: I realized my buildbots
went offline earlier today...
Unfortunately, I have not had time to look into this yet :-/. Just wanted to
let you know I haven't forgotten!
I wanted
+1
On Jan 14, 2010 8:29 AM, Kristian Nielsen kniel...@knielsen-hq.org
wrote:
[moving the discussion to maria-develop...@]
Timour Katchaounov tim...@askmonty.org writes:
Sergey,
1. buy VS Enterprise Edition (or Standard Edition, I wasn't able to
figure out
what exactly do we need to make
I've posted a brief list of what I did (from what I remember) to setup
a Maria DB buildbot on a Solaris 10 (SPARC) system. You can find it
at http://littlehat.homelinux.org/tuts/MariaDB/buildbot/README-SOL10-SPARC
. Hopefully it helps others in the future.
Maybe we can post part of it at
Kristian,
Sorry for making it seem like I wasn't adressing the group but I thought it
was Arjen posing the question about build hosts.
On a related note, I just got a netra 1u system I can put opensolaris on and
configure. Do you have notes on configuring buildbot in addition to those
found on
Arjen,
Do you have a matrix of distros/platforms you'd like to see added to the
build pool? I have some more compute power that I might be able to add to
the build pool.
-Adam
On Dec 18, 2009 6:02 PM, Michael Widenius mo...@askmonty.org wrote:
Hi!
Kristian == Kristian Nielsen
27 matches
Mail list logo
