Hi!
> Is this because the table ta_l is connected to a remote table trough
> spider that already has the
> rows in it ?
Yes.
> If yes, then it would be good to have a comment about this is in the
> test and also insert
> data that is different from the original one to make this part clear.
Hi!
> All spider tests now passes in 10.2
Great!
> This fails as the above variable doesn't yet exists.
> I will update the test results as soon the variable exists again.
ok.
Thanks,
Kentoku
2016-11-25 0:55 GMT+09:00 Michael Widenius :
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Nov 24,
Hi!
> Better to instead test MYSQL versions than have a define that is
> always declared.
> With current code, the last #else in spd_param.cc will never be used:
You right and I'll add code of testing MYSQL versions in Spider code later.
Thanks,
Kentoku
2016-11-24 23:07 GMT+09:00 Michael
Hi!
> If this is ok, I will add this and close MDEV-7700
It looks connect string is visible, but never used. This is different
from what I think.
I just added patch for connect string to MDEV-7698. Please review it.
This changes do not cause error for federated_partition test.
Thanks,
Kentoku
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 8:21 PM, kentoku wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> In which case is it lost ?
>> Can you add a test to federated_partition.test that shows in which case the
>> connection information is lost?
>
> when create a table like the following
>
> create table tbl_a(
>
Hi!
> In which case is it lost ?
> Can you add a test to federated_partition.test that shows in which case the
> connection information is lost?
when create a table like the following
create table tbl_a(
col_a int,
primary key(col_a)
)engine=myisam connection 'some settings for whole table'
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Michael Widenius
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:38 PM, kentoku wrote:
>> Hi Monty!
>>
>> Thank you for starting this task. I appreciate it.
>>
>>> Kentoku, do you have patches for the test
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:38 PM, kentoku wrote:
> Hi Monty!
>
> Thank you for starting this task. I appreciate it.
>
>> Kentoku, do you have patches for the test files, or should I just take
>> them from the above spider branch or from somewhere else ?
>
> I just
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:31 PM, kentoku wrote:
> Hi Monty!
>
> Please see comment at 2016-05-07 19:15 for patches for MariaDB 10.2.
>
>> I don't think this it will work removing the usage of p_elem->connect_string
>>
>> This is because each partition may have a
Hi Monty!
Please see comment at 2016-05-07 19:15 for patches for MariaDB 10.2.
> I don't think this it will work removing the usage of p_elem->connect_string
>
> This is because each partition may have a different connect string.
I understand this behavior. But I don't think this overwriting
Hi Monty!
Thank you for starting this task. I appreciate it.
> Kentoku, do you have patches for the test files, or should I just take
> them from the above spider branch or from somewhere else ?
I just attached test files into MDEV-7698. Please use it. And please
let me know if you get a error
Hi!
Now working on MDEV-7700 Spiral patch 002_mariadb-10.0.15.spider.diff
+++ ./002_mariadb-10.1.8-spider/sql/ha_partition.cc2015-10-14
01:48:53.392665313 +0900
@@ -327,7 +327,9 @@ void ha_partition::init_handler_variable
m_file_buffer= NULL;
m_name_buffer_ptr= NULL;
m_engine_array=
Hi!
I have now started to work on the spider patches for MariaDB 10.2, MDEV-7698.
I have moved all code from maria-10.1-spider to a new branch
maria-10.2-spider and added some more patches.
I have closed all related MDEV's in MDEV-7698 that is now included in
10.2-spider.
While doing this, I
13 matches
Mail list logo