Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Matthieu Codron wrote: > > the syntax would be > > term {#id} > : definition > Python-Markdown already has extensions for Attribute Lists [1] and Definition Lists [2] (both also available as part of Extra [3]). However, due to th

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

Right now, I don't think I would implement this particular syntax. F- -- Fletcher T. Penney fletc...@fletcherpenney.net On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Matthieu Codron wrote: > From: "Fletcher T. Penney" > > I'm not sure I want to head down that path yet for MultiMarkdown. I'm not > ruling

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

> > From: "Fletcher T. Penney" > > I'm not sure I want to head down that path yet for MultiMarkdown. I'm not > ruling it out for all time, but I worry about the "cruft" vs "reward" > balance. > > I understand your point of view. But I'd like to avoid future implementation divergences ; so I'd lik

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

> > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Michel Fortin wrote: > Le 1-juil.-2013 ? 11:33, Matthieu Codron a ?crit > : > > > Hello, > > > > As I am using markdown to write documentation, I am often tempted to make > > links to terms in definition

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Michel Fortin wrote: > Le 1-juil.-2013 ? 11:33, Matthieu Codron a > ?crit : > > > Hello, > > > > As I am using markdown to write documentation, I am often tempted to make > > links to terms in definition lists. > > > >

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

Le 1-juil.-2013 à 11:33, Matthieu Codron a écrit : > Hello, > > As I am using markdown to write documentation, I am often tempted to make > links to terms in definition lists. > > Since this is not possible for now (at least in php markdown extra), I was > wondering if t

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

o it regularly, but I generally compose in Markdown without thinking about it and I use definition lists with this syntax quite a bit in other systems where it's standard, so it just comes naturally! c -- Chris Lott ___ Markdown-Discuss mai

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

On 2013-07-02 06:20 +0200 sendi...@gmx.net wrote: > I would even go further and (gradually) allow setting {#id .class > attr="attr"} for *any* element. > > For block elements it would be in the last or following line and for > span elements it would directly follow: e.g. *imporant > text*{.special

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

cumentation, I am often tempted to make > links to terms in definition lists. > > Since this is not possible for now (at least in php markdown extra), I was > wondering if this could be a common addition in major implementation > supporting definition lists. > > the syntax

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

Aristotle Pagaltzis writes: > * Andy Lee [2013-07-01 18:55]: >> Out of curiosity, do I understand correctly that >> >> term >> : definition >> >> is already in common usage when people write plain text? I was not >> aware of that, so if so, I may start adopting it in my own emails etc. > > I’ve

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

On Jul 1, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Matthieu Codron wrote: > As I am using markdown to write documentation, I am often tempted to make > links to terms in definition lists. > > Since this is not possible for now (at least in php markdown extra), […] It is. You just have to write

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

* Andy Lee [2013-07-01 18:55]: > Out of curiosity, do I understand correctly that > > term > : definition > > is already in common usage when people write plain text? I was not > aware of that, so if so, I may start adopting it in my own emails etc. I’ve never seen it in email. _

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

I don't know about the {#id} part, but MultiMarkdown recognizes that syntax for definition lists. Out of curiosity, do I understand correctly that term : definition is already in common usage when people write plain text? I was not aware of that, so if so, I may start adopting it in m

Re: attribute blocks for definition lists

t; links to terms in definition lists. > > Since this is not possible for now (at least in php markdown extra), I was > wondering if this could be a common addition in major implementation > supporting definition lists. > > the syntax would be > > term {#id} > :

attribute blocks for definition lists

Hello, As I am using markdown to write documentation, I am often tempted to make links to terms in definition lists. Since this is not possible for now (at least in php markdown extra), I was wondering if this could be a common addition in major implementation supporting definition lists. the

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Le 2008-11-21 à 11:36, Jason Blevins a écrit : On Babelmark Markdown.pl 1.0.2b8 honors this implicit reference syntax but 1.0.1 doesn't. I was aware of this syntax so my expected output is that of the beta version. I haven't used it myself though because I've often wondered how 'standard'

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Le 2008-11-21 à 12:26, Jason Blevins a écrit : Superscripts are nice in print, but there you don't have to click on them. With a proper stylesheet you can make them as easy to click as anything else. Look at footnotes on Daring Fireball for instance:

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jason Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Waylan Limberg wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Jason Blevins >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I couldn't find any discussion of it on the list, but here's the >> > changelog entry: >> > >> > 1.0.2b2 - 20

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Waylan Limberg wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Jason Blevins > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I couldn't find any discussion of it on the list, but here's the > > changelog entry: > > > > 1.0.2b2 - 20 Mar 2005 > > > >+ Experimental support for [this] as a synonym for [this][].

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Jason Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I couldn't find any discussion of it on the list, but here's the > changelog entry: > > 1.0.2b2 - 20 Mar 2005 > >+ Experimental support for [this] as a synonym for [this][]. Interestingly, this a completely differ

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Thomas Nichols wrote: > Tangentially, I notice that this post by Waylan uses a link syntax which > doesn't seem to be defined by > but seems to > work in some implementations at - that is, > > from the git r

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Thomas Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tangentially, I notice that this post by Waylan uses a link syntax which > doesn't seem to be defined by > but seems to > work in some implementations at

Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

> One thing is for sure, I will have something included in the next > release which I anticipate happening soonish. > > [1]: http://gitorious.org/projects/python-markdown/repos/mainline > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Andreas Åkre Solberg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: definition lists?

]> wrote: >Any way of writing definition lists? > > Andreas > ___ > Markdown-Discuss mailing list > Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss > > --

Re: definition lists?

Andreas Åkre Solberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08-11-14 19.26 Any way of writing definition lists? Depends on which implementation you use. There are a few implementation that allows this. jem -- Jan Erik Moström - www.mostrom

definition lists?

Any way of writing definition lists? Andreas smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

Re: definition lists

http://www.michelf.com/projects/php-markdown/extra/#def-list ___ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

definition lists

I haven't followed the discussion for a while but I seem to remember that there was a discussion of how definition list should look like. Has there been any decision of what syntax to use? (I don't actually need a script for doing the markdown => HTML conversion right now, but I would like to be a

Re: Feature request: definition lists

What is this "ZML". Lots of mention of it on the 'net (for at least a year now) but no sign of what it really is. Vapourware? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: excellent discussion! passion on all sides, backed with reason... i think it boils down to one thing. look at the bright side: andrew has sai