On 10/12/2010 09:56 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> So I don't think it to be appropriate to differ between marketing and
> localization only by different ISO codes.
ISO 639-3 language codes are three letters.
ISO 3166-2 country codes are two letters.
disc...@de.libreoffice.org would be the Germa
jonathon wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 02:27 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
>
>> For the moment, let's use the general marketing list.
>
> No, no, a thousand times no.
Being a professional marketer since 1981, I have been the strongest
supporter of geography based marketing lists inside the OOo project, and
On 10/15/2010 02:27 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> For the moment, let's use the general marketing list.
No, no, a thousand times no.
a) One of the major problems with OOo marketing in the US, was that
they did not have their own list.
Combining a generic, worldwide marketing policy with a geogra
Le 2010-10-16 13:05, jonathon a écrit :
On 10/15/2010 12:32 PM, James Walker wrote:
be to put the US and Canada in a group. and then try to put Mexico in a
group with other Cental American countries where spanish is the language that
they speak.
I think that there should be at least one pers
On 10/15/2010 12:32 PM, James Walker wrote:
> be to put the US and Canada in a group. and then try to put Mexico in a
> group with other Cental American countries where spanish is the language that
> they speak.
I think that there should be at least one person who is part of the US
group, and al
- Original Message -
From: Marc Paré
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Fri Oct 15 15:43:27 2010
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] list name for the US group
Le 2010-10-15 15:24, James Walker a écrit :
I am all for that. last I had heard Indiana has plans to install 300,000
computers using
: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Fri Oct 15 15:43:27 2010
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] list name for the US group
Le 2010-10-15 15:24, James Walker a écrit :
>
> I am all for that. last I had heard Indiana has plans to install 300,000
> computers using a combination of Ubuntu, a
Le 2010-10-15 15:24, James Walker a écrit :
I am all for that. last I had heard Indiana has plans to install 300,000
computers using a combination of Ubuntu, and Novell for operating systems.
I am not too sure on how many of those they have in the field at this time.
Check out this link for
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-10-15 14:55, James Walker a écrit :
>
> Thanks all, The US has been a difficult market to makes inroads into,
>> Indiana has done some good things with Open Source in the classroom to the
>> point that my children had to turn there assi
Le 2010-10-15 14:55, James Walker a écrit :
Thanks all, The US has been a difficult market to makes inroads into,
Indiana has done some good things with Open Source in the classroom to the
point that my children had to turn there assignments in in ODF format to
school. Recently I have been gett
Thanks all, The US has been a difficult market to makes inroads into,
Indiana has done some good things with Open Source in the classroom to the
point that my children had to turn there assignments in in ODF format to
school. Recently I have been getting inquiries into materials for other
schools
> Yes, however, I am just re-recovering from back surgery and am not too
> too mobile yet. Learning how to walk again and more nasty stuff.
Please your health is much more important.
>
> Florian said to go ahead and add to the
> events calendar even if there is no speaker. At least it will sh
Le 2010-10-15 14:19, Drew Jensen a écrit :
if you know of some events in Canada, point
them out to me! We can all help out.
Yes - and vice versa.
Also, generating collateral really just puts more items into the
community chest doesn't it.
Actually speaking of helping each other - I'm looki
> if you know of some events in Canada, point
> them out to me! We can all help out.
>
Yes - and vice versa.
Also, generating collateral really just puts more items into the
community chest doesn't it.
Actually speaking of helping each other - I'm looking for someone
willing to speak at a LUG
Le 2010-10-15 13:34, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hi,
to sum up the current discussion, I will create
market...@us.libreoffice.org over the weekend.
Do we all agree on this, or did I miss something? (Quite behind my
inbox...)
Florian
Yes, it sounds like there is consensus (looks like I am
On Fri Oct 15 2010 10:34:58 GMT-0700 (PDT) Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
to sum up the current discussion, I will create
market...@us.libreoffice.org over the weekend.
Do we all agree on this, or did I miss something? (Quite behind my
inbox...)
Florian
+1
Andy
(La Mesa, CA, USA)
--
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 12:26 -0500, Dave Johnson wrote:
> I Can take care of the central time zone in the usa.
>
> Dave Johnson
>
Thanks Dave,
Just to be clear - I'm not really that concerned about a list name.
Rather I am interested in having TDF/LibreOffice represented on the
ground at shows
Hi,
to sum up the current discussion, I will create
market...@us.libreoffice.org over the weekend.
Do we all agree on this, or did I miss something? (Quite behind my inbox...)
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 9966
I Can take care of the central time zone in the usa.
Dave Johnson
On Oct 15, 2010 11:32 AM, "Italo Vignoli" wrote:
James Walker wrote:
> The only issue I have with that idea is it is exactly how we always seem
to
>...
It's just a question of time. In the past, it was a different issue as
Sun w
James Walker wrote:
> The only issue I have with that idea is it is exactly how we always seem to
> end up never starting a Marketing list for the US. This has been an ongoing
> discussion in the community for years. I for one would like to finally put
> it behind us and finally create the list
Hi Marc, *
Marc Paré schrieb:
[...]
Maybe a temporary solution would be a blend of both, something like
disc...@us_ca.libreoffice.org .
Please don't add temporary lists.
I'd like to see all the mails archived, so we would need to keep these
lists (even if they are set inactive when creating
Le 2010-10-15 09:26, James Walker a écrit :
My firm believe is that we can easily combine the US and Canada on one list,
the question is what would that list name be. I really do not want to
alienate any of the Canadian list members by calling it
market...@us.libreoffice.org if there would be an
Well as you can see, I am willing to help an anyway that I can. Lucky for
me right now I am slow at work and have some time on my hands
Just let me know how I can help
James
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:
>
> >
> > The only issue I have with that idea is it is exactly
>
> The only issue I have with that idea is it is exactly how we always seem to
> end up never starting a Marketing list for the US. This has been an ongoing
> discussion in the community for years. I for one would like to finally put
> it behind us and finally create the list and move on.
>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> James Walker wrote:
> > My firm believe is that we can easily combine the US and Canada on one
> list,
> > the question is what would that list name be. I really do not want to
> > alienate any of the Canadian list members by calling it
> >
James Walker wrote:
> My firm believe is that we can easily combine the US and Canada on one list,
> the question is what would that list name be. I really do not want to
> alienate any of the Canadian list members by calling it
> market...@us.libreoffice.org if there would be any concern from the
My firm believe is that we can easily combine the US and Canada on one list,
the question is what would that list name be. I really do not want to
alienate any of the Canadian list members by calling it
market...@us.libreoffice.org if there would be any concern from the Canadian
members.
If we do
James Walker wrote:
> I have really not seen it as Marketing being split up by language.
> especially for English, and Spanish. There are so many areas that both of
> these languages are spoken that it would be hard to cover marketing based on
> it. The advantage however is that the materials wil
I have really not seen it as Marketing being split up by language.
especially for English, and Spanish. There are so many areas that both of
these languages are spoken that it would be hard to cover marketing based on
it. The advantage however is that the materials will be able to be used in
more
Marc Paré wrote:
> But, if we are to be divided up according to country designation as per
> SC wishes -- in this case especially the US, then no problem. We should
> make sure that sharing of resources where they are scarce, as in my case
> Canada, care be taken in providing support for the marke
Hi,
Sorry for the delay here.
I was thinking about this and more importantly I was reading emails.
OpenOffice.org it seems to me was structured very much along language
lines and I would suppose that this will naturally happen here also.
These language demarcations where originally, I believe,
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 21:10 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Hi Marc, *
>
> Marc Paré schrieb:
> > [...]
> >
> > Just a note to see if there had been a decision about this? Are we going
> > with the sole US group or n.amer. group? Or are people still thinking
> > this one out?
> >
> I think we cov
Hi Marc, *
Marc Paré schrieb:
[...]
Just a note to see if there had been a decision about this? Are we going
with the sole US group or n.amer. group? Or are people still thinking
this one out?
I think we covered the most important points in this discussion - at
least for North America.
In m
On Oct 14, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-10-12 20:41, Marc Paré a écrit :
>> Le 2010-10-12 20:05, Alexandro Colorado a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> I am not sure it makes sense to split marketing efforts between
>>> countries.
>>> Is much better to have separation between languages instead
Le 2010-10-12 20:41, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2010-10-12 20:05, Alexandro Colorado a écrit :
I am not sure it makes sense to split marketing efforts between
countries.
Is much better to have separation between languages instead.
Hi Alexandro:
For some countries, a split like this would hel
Le 2010-10-12 20:05, Alexandro Colorado a écrit :
I am not sure it makes sense to split marketing efforts between countries.
Is much better to have separation between languages instead.
Hi Alexandro:
For some countries, a split like this would help in getting
representation to exposition
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Bernhard Dippold <
bernh...@familie-dippold.at> wrote:
> Hi Jonathon, all,
>
> jonathon schrieb:
>
> On 10/12/2010 07:39 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>>
>> Trying to get some structure in, so any advice welcome.
>>>
>>
>> ISO 639-3 language code, then .libreoff
Hi Jonathon, all,
jonathon schrieb:
On 10/12/2010 07:39 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Trying to get some structure in, so any advice welcome.
ISO 639-3 language code, then .libreoffice.org: These are used for
localization projects.
ISO 3166-2 country code, then .then libreoffice.org: Thes
On 10/12/2010 07:39 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Trying to get some structure in, so any advice welcome.
ISO 639-3 language code, then .libreoffice.org: These are used for
localization projects.
ISO 3166-2 country code, then .then libreoffice.org: These are used for
marketing projects.
dis
guys, it's the 13th in parts of the world and the OO.o site started
flying the 10th birthday colors - I really want to talk to a few friends
over there at the moment.
I don't think the project will come to grinding halt if we wait a few
hours on this...OK
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to marketing+
Hi all,
As Charles said, I think a US Group, to be declined later on, would be
better for now. So please Florian, an disc...@us.libreoffice.org and a
market...@us.libreoffice.org would be great for a beginning. That
would also align with the other mailing lists and Regional groups and
would be eas
Le 2010-10-12 15:53, James Walker a écrit :
might as well stick with the normal and go with disc...@us.libreoffice.org
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Florian Effenberger<
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
Hi,
what mailing list name structure would you propose for the US group (and
o
That is true, I would guess that disc...@na.libreoffice.org would work
unless the NA needs to be used for some other region
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Ryan Singer
> wrote:
>
> > disc...@us.libreoffice.org is great.
> >
> > On
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Ryan Singer wrote:
> disc...@us.libreoffice.org is great.
>
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2010, Florian Effenberger
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what mailing list name structure would you propose for the US group (and
> other groups for large regions)?
>
Thought the pre
might as well stick with the normal and go with disc...@us.libreoffice.org
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Florian Effenberger <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what mailing list name structure would you propose for the US group (and
> other groups for large regions)?
>
> Mail
disc...@us.libreoffice.org is great.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2010, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what mailing list name structure would you propose for the US group (and
> other groups for large regions)?
>
> Mailing lists for the local projects will be @project.libreoffice.org, like
> d
Hi,
what mailing list name structure would you propose for the US group (and
other groups for large regions)?
Mailing lists for the local projects will be @project.libreoffice.org,
like disc...@de.libreoffice.org. I'm thinking about what we should
set-up for US group.
Either u...@libreoffi
47 matches
Mail list logo
