As there is a project for new front page (at least I perceived that way),
I personally would op for two different doors (in the long term)
A page directed to non-commercial entity's | A page directed to
commercial entity's (and non-profits). More or less Cor his message
Or even more split out
@Cor: Good proposal; I think
There are few catches though:
Not sure how far TDF is willing to go. Business/Organizations are not
prohibited using use
LibreOffice 'rolling'. While a distinction between Home/Private &
Business/Organizations
might suggesting otherwise.
Visa versa is rolling
Hi Telesto,
Thanks for engaging and sparking discussion here. There is much that is
interesting but this:
On 24/10/2020 09:49, Telesto wrote:
> And I assume there are some difference between CIB <-> Collabora (except
> the name), but I'm surely not knowing what that should be. I mean it,
[Editted version of the one I posted on the Board mailing list by
accident; thanks for reminders :-]
Official Edition is really confusing. Which suggests there is also a
Unofficial edition.
A copycat fork? Or are those LTS releases powered by clones, trying to
make a profit from TDF
Hi,
Telesto wrote on 24/10/2020 10:49:
> ...
> And to make 'LTS' bit more attractive.. drop the whole stable/still
> edition at TDF.
> People using LibreOffice should be on 'rolling'. If they dislike that
> they can dig in they archive reprository to find some older version.
> Also, users don't
It certainly (correctly) indicates there are unofficial editions in
circulation. I see that as a helpful differentiator. I would not jump to
the conclusion they are untrustworthy; however, the use of a validated
"Libreoffice technology" signifier as Italo has proposed would fix that if
it were a
Doesn't this imply there are some unofficial and, thereby, untrustworthy
editions in circulation?
Nige
> On 23 Oct 2020, at 06:44, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> Taking on board all the concerns about not giving the impression of a
> weaker version, and if "no label" is really not an option, how
Taking on board all the concerns about not giving the impression of a
weaker version, and if "no label" is really not an option, how about
calling TDF's package "official edition"?
S.
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, 14:31 Marc Paré, wrote:
> Perhaps Italo could chime in and inform us if having "no label
Perhaps Italo could chime in and inform us if having "no label is not an
option". We have to be consistent in a marketing plan, whether short or
long-term.
But, for me, the preference would be to continue with no label if this
is an option, however, if a label is needed, "Community Edition" is
+1 to what Uwe and Michael and Telesto have been saying.
Personal / Community are not accurate labels because they imply missing
features. LibreOffice as we currently know it is full featured. By
introducing these labels, you are signaling an intent to "dumb down"
LibreOffice.
The current
Hi
Am 20.10.20 um 10:50 schrieb Michael Weghorn:
> If "no label is not an option" (as stated by Italo), I'd currently
> prefer something like "TDF Edition" over "Personal Edition" or
> "Community Edition" as well, given the negative/misleading connotations
> the latter may result in.
"no label
Hi
Am 20.10.20 um 10:50 schrieb Michael Weghorn:
> If "no label is not an option" (as stated by Italo), I'd currently
> prefer something like "TDF Edition" over "Personal Edition" or
> "Community Edition" as well, given the negative/misleading connotations
> the latter may result in.
"no label
LibreOffice Community Project
LibreOffice Enterprise by CIB
LibreOffice Enterprise by Collabora
LibreOffice Enterprise by ...
Personal Edition has the feeling of, not allowed somewhere (in the office)
Community vs Enterprise Edition has the feeling of, Enterprise is better
Community Project gives
On 12/10/2020 23:30, Telesto wrote:
> Some attempts:
> LibreOffice shipped by TDF.
> LibreOffice TDF release.
> LibreOffice distributed/compiled by TDF.
> LibreOffice made possible by TDF.
>
If "no label is not an option" (as stated by Italo), I'd currently
prefer something
Op 14-10-2020 om 15:52 schreef Marc Paré:
Hi Telesto,
Thanks for the large reply, of which, from what I gather is that you are
saying that the definition of "Community" can be viewed from many
perspectives.
True. And one of those is Commercial Company's sharing a limited version
under
the
Hi Telesto,
Thanks for the large reply, of which, from what I gather is that you are
saying that the definition of "Community" can be viewed from many
perspectives. My comment to this is, this is where the TDF/LibreOffice
needs to message in a clearer way on the website as to its definition of
Le 2020-10-13 à 14 h 48, Nigel Verity a écrit :
> Hi Mike
>
> Although I cannot think of a suitable alternative I have slight reservations
> about the use of the term "community". It may be just a British thing but in
> the UK the term is slightly nuanced to mean "good but not the very best",
Hi Telesto,
Let me confess that I only read a part of the discussions - I'm simply
not able to keep up with all.
But I am interested in opinions and reasons for ideas. So I have a question:
Telesto wrote on 13/10/2020 18:26:
>
(skipping may lines with IMO logic ideas/POVs - thanks for
So, for me, "Community Edition" is fine. We would also need to decide on
the commercial label at the same time, of which, I prefer "Powered by ...".
Related to the 'Community Edition' I point to page 54 of
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/qPMWRFsxwQ6QFpK#pdfviewer
Which is summery of
13 October 2020 16:56
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] The Edition Matter
The commercial label is Enterprise, while "powered by..." can be part of
the product name. We should remember that we are discussing a label and
not a product name, which
The commercial label is Enterprise, while "powered by..." can be part of
the product name. We should remember that we are discussing a label and
not a product name, which does not change and is LibreOffice.
The label is an attribute, with the objective of adding information to
the product name.
I suggest we try to keep it as honest as possible. The membership should
speak out on this item re: "edition".
IMO, "Community Edition" is fine, and agree that this could be modified
at a future date when the membership would review the edition labels;
perhaps reviewed every 4-5 years or
Hey Telesto,
On 12/10/2020 23:30, Telesto wrote:
Some attempts:
LibreOffice shipped by TDF.
LibreOffice TDF release.
LibreOffice distributed/compiled by TDF.
LibreOffice made possible by TDF.
The logo already has "The Document Foundation" underneath, so I don't
think this really adds anything.
Hey Telesto,
On 12/10/2020 23:30, Telesto wrote:
>
> Some attempts:
> LibreOffice shipped by TDF.
> LibreOffice TDF release.
> LibreOffice distributed/compiled by TDF.
> LibreOffice made possible by TDF.
The logo already has "The Document Foundation" underneath, so I don't
think this really
24 matches
Mail list logo
