On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 04:23:29PM -0400, Kara Schiltz wrote:
ZDNet
4.19.10
Fedora taps Zarafa open source groupware for 13
By Paula Rooney
Fedora’s selection of Zarafa as an open source groupware component in
Fedora 13 is very interesting.
The beta of Fedora 13, code named
So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6298
some of it is fairly unflattering:
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3877446/Fedora-13-Beta-The-Seen-and-Troubling-Unseen.htm
I'm a bit uncomfortable with this myself; the availability of
Hi guys!
I'm from Allegheny too, but I figured I could help here anyway... especially
as someone who understands close to nothing about Fedora.
I read the press release and I think it is good!
My suggestions:
- It might be good to provide a brief description of Linux. I have no idea
how to
Here is the log from the BTRFS interview. Thanks again, Josef. I'm going
to start working on edits.
-Hannah Kowen
(12:06:19 PM) zodbot: Meeting ended Tue Apr 20 16:06:16 2010 UTC.
Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
(12:06:21 PM) zodbot: Minutes:
Start End Name
Tue 20-Apr Tue 27-Apr Update and freeze the screen shots page
Tue 27-Apr Tue 04-May Marketing: Final One Page Release Notes
Tue 27-Apr Tue 04-May Brief news distribution network
Tue 27-Apr Tue 04-May Marketing: Final Screen Shots
Tue 27-Apr Mon 07-Jun Monitor
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6298
some of it is fairly unflattering:
Now I am not in the told you so department, but it unfolds as I expected.
Not much we can do now without harming either Fedora or Zarafa.
Maybe Zarafa can think of renaming the open source edition just as fedora v
RHEL?
Jan
- Original Message -
From:
Hi Jan,
Am Dienstag, 20. April 2010 19:47:22 schrieb Jan Wildeboer:
Now I am not in the told you so department, but it unfolds as I expected.
Not much we can do now without harming either Fedora or Zarafa.
Harm? This sounds dramatized. Fedora is in the press with zarafa as a feature
- and we
I do love how the journalist starts the article on
itmanagement.earthweb.com.
Nelson Marques
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/evilclown.htm
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 09:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 09:04:28AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6298
some of it is fairly unflattering:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6298
some of it is fairly unflattering:
As long as it doesn't becom Fedora investing time and ressources on
correcting and defending openCore companies, fine with me.
I still would advice Zarafa to call the opensource version different. Makes
all of our lives easier. But that is mid-term and up to Zarafa. Short term
we should try to
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 09:04:28AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6298
some of it is fairly unflattering:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 03:29:00PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6298
some of it is fairly unflattering:
[[Marketing_brain_dump]] - if you could add it to the new ideas
section, so I can add it and migrate it accordingly into the plan,
that would be excellent. :)
On 4/20/10, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 02:00:56PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Adam Williamson
I'd like to add that this would be a great piece for a press kit as well :)
On 4/20/10, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 02:00:56PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Adam Williamson said the following on 04/20/2010 09:04 AM Pacific Time:
So, Zarafa is getting a lot
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 02:54:24PM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
I'd like to add that this would be a great piece for a press kit as well :)
Added!
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_brain_dumpdiff=167992oldid=165559
--
Paul W. Frields
Garland! I'm delighted you're here - we would -love- some help /
brainpower on keyword optimization.
You're here at a great time - we're getting ready to ship out F13 in
less than a month, at which point we'll be launching directly into F14
planning and new ideas - and optimization is definitely
On 04/21/2010 01:11 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
As some others noted, I think pulling the feature is unwarranted. At
least part of the compelling story around Zarafa is that it's included
because a volunteer took advantage of our open, community process to
get a cool piece of software into
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Garland Binns gbi...@mediarake.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
My name is Garland. I've been looking through fedoraproject.org and I
noticed that there isn't a ton of keyword optimization. There definitely
appears to be a lot of potential for increasing our rank and
20 matches
Mail list logo
