==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Yeah well, Michael Moore was on Larry King last night talking about how the
lesson o
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Aug 2, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Tom Cod wrote:
> ...surely we're treading on thin ice i
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
There wasn't a revolution going on in S. Africa in the 1980s? I beg to
differ. Non
: [Marxism] Stalinism and Bakuninism:
>
> Anybody not "proudly part of the tradition of the First International"?
>
> Not knocking it, but how meaningful is that in terms of distinguishing
> people on the Left?
As meaningful as calling oneself a "marxist".
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Aug 1, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Tom Cod wrote:
> ...like I was saying that was a good t
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Anybody not "proudly part of the tradition of the First International"?
Not knockin
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I get a kick out of you Shane, like I was saying that was a good thing.
Obviously n
all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ==
>
>
> Tom Cod (tomc...@gmail.com) wrote on 2010-08-01 at 13:50:20 in about
> Re: [Marxism] Stalinism and Bakuninism:
> >
> > Thanks, one other thing before I have to split: as to "Ba
] Stalinism and Bakuninism:
>
> Thanks, one other thing before I have to split: as to "Bakuninism", Joe
> Hill, Sacco & Vanzetti and Emma Goldman and numerous others considered
> themselves part of this tradition. We can disagree with that, but to
> suggest they were c
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Aug 1, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Tom Cod wrote:
> ...sanctimoniously recycling right win
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Thanks, one other thing before I have to split: as to "Bakuninism", Joe
Hill, Sacco
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Lüko Willms wrote:
>> This has to be one of the mo
hould
chalk it up to naivete.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Lüko Willms wrote:
>
>
> Tom Cod (tomc...@gmail.com) wrote on 2010-08-01 at 10:54:50 in about
> Re: [Marxism] Stalinism and Bakuninism (was: Earliest use of word
> "Stalinism"?):
> >
> > Tro
] Stalinism and Bakuninism (was: Earliest use of word
"Stalinism"?):
>
> Trotsky deals with dead on in "Their
> Morals and Ours" in response to exactly these arguments regarding the
> Bolshevik Revolution and Civil War
>
This is an excellent point of refe
: [Marxism] Stalinism and Bakuninism (was: Earliest use of word
"Stalinism"?):
>
> This has to be one of the most asinine things I have read on marxmail.
Could you please give a political meaning to your zoological reaction?
Cheers,
Lüko Willms
Fr
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Please, Greg, don´t hurry at conclusions.
I, for one, _do_ understand the basic id
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
What a mish-mash! So the CNT, the IWW and the Kronstadt sailors were petty
bourgois
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Lüko Willms wrote:
>> I have long believed that S
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
No, no. I could understand the link with Bukharin. Nobody who has read
Deutscher´s b
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Néstor Gorojovsky (nmg...@gmail.com) wrote on 2010-07-31 at 10:00:18 in
about Re:
20 matches
Mail list logo
