Re: [Marxism] What we share with other animals

2009-11-22 Thread Lüko Willms
: [Marxism] What we share with other animals: > > > But I have to say that the forwarded comment from Gilles hit the nail on the > head. The question is not evaluating different kinds of life from some > non-existent objective point. We deal with these things from the only > authen

Re: [Marxism] What we share with other animals

2009-11-20 Thread Mark Lause
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I haven't plunged into this one, because it's one of those hopelessly irrational arg

Re: [Marxism] What we share with other animals

2009-11-20 Thread Greg McDonald
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Gilles D'Aymery wrote: There's been quite a few posts theorizing about whether "an

Re: [Marxism] what we share with other animals

2009-11-20 Thread Jeffrey Thomas Piercy
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Several here have come rather close to endorsing the notion that animals deserve som

Re: [Marxism] what we share with other animals

2009-11-19 Thread Lüko Willms
: [Marxism] what we share with other animals: > > > Whatever. Plants and fungi are also living creatures. > - > No nervous system, no nerve endings, no pain, no suffering. So what? How about animals eathing other animals. How to en

Re: [Marxism] What we share with other animals

2009-11-19 Thread Greg McDonald
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == David Walters wrote: Greg, fetuses *feel pain*. Do you want to go down this route?

Re: [Marxism] What we share with other animals

2009-11-19 Thread Lüko Willms
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == nada (dwalters...@gmail.com) wrote on 2009-11-18 at 07:17:26 in about Re: [Marxism