Paddy Apling (e.c.apl...@btinternet.com) wrote on 2009-09-19 at 18:53:34 in
about Re: [Marxism] Query on British historiography:
Strange to hide this pro-imperialist propaganda unter a Query of British
historiography:
From then on there could be no doubt that WWII was a just war, a war
Lenin's Tomb wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.dewrote:
The Partei Die Linke shows the way forward? Well, yes, back into bourgeois
politics.
Yeah, because the working masses have already *abandoned* bourgeois
politics, and the Linke wants to
An organization I belong to is beginning a long overdue debate on Cuba. To a
large extent the writings of Farber have had a free ride in this milieu and
I would like to change that.
I know that Louis Proyect's blog has carried a series of valuable analyses
of Farber's factual unreliability and
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Einde O'Callaghan eind...@freenet.dewrote:
I feel that both Richard and Lüko have an over-negative attitude to DIE
LINKE.
Ahem, ahem! It was *sarcasm*.
--
Richard Seymour
Writer and blogger
Email: leninstombb...@googlemail.com
Website:
NY Times, September 20, 2009
Visuals
The Revolution Will Be Illustrated
By STEVEN HELLER
Early-20th-century artists and designers greatly admired Russian
revolutionary posters and typography, and the art movements that sprang
from the October Revolution: Constructivism, Suprematism and
Lenin's Tomb wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Einde O'Callaghan eind...@freenet.dewrote:
I feel that both Richard and Lüko have an over-negative attitude to DIE
LINKE.
Ahem, ahem! It was *sarcasm*.
It must be living in Germany that does it - I'm obviously suffering from
an
Lüko Willms wrote:
Bhaskar Sunkara (bhaskar.sunk...@gmail.com) wrote on 2009-09-19 at
15:45:13 in about Re: [Marxism] Germany's Die Linke shows the way for the
left:
There is a militant minority in Die Linke that wants to build an
oppositional movement and not be mere left-social
Why do I keep receiving multiple copies of the same post?
Jim Farmelant
On So, 20 Sep 2009 10:32:05 +0200 (MES) =?iso-8859-1?q?L=FCko_Willms?=
lueko.wil...@t-online.de writes:
Bhaskar Sunkara (bhaskar.sunk...@gmail.com) wrote on 2009-09-19 at
15:45:13 in about Re: [Marxism] Germany's Die
I think it's far more complicated that what Paddy or Lüko think.
I think Paddy is more wrong than Lüko on this in that regardless of how
one feels about British entry into the war in 1939, or it's aid or not
to anti-fascist struggles. WWII was first and foremost an attack by
Fascism against
nada wrote:
I think it's far more complicated that what Paddy or Lüko think.
I think Paddy is more wrong than Lüko on this in that regardless of how
one feels about British entry into the war in 1939, or it's aid or not
to anti-fascist struggles. WWII was first and foremost an attack by
http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/783/oskarlafontaine.php
Oskar Lafontaine: ‘We want to govern’ The results for the German left party
Die Linke in the August 30 regional elections are impressive, particularly
the 21.3% achieved in the federal state of Saarland. But is this the
beginning of the end for
I don't think it really is as simple as either Luko or Einde (sp?) make it
out to be. Some places where Die Linke have entered coalitions with the SPD
do show both the limits to electoral politics and the necessity to meet the
people were they are at to squeeze out even the slightest of gains for
Never underestimate the vicious venality of the USA.
- Original Message -
From: MICHAEL YATES mikedjya...@msn.com
To: David Schanoes sartes...@earthlink.net
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 2:31 PM
Subject: [Marxism] Blog Post: A Dirty Little Secret in Boulder, CO, with
readers'
I hope that my second part will conform to Michael L's ideas. Michael's
absence will be a great disappointment. Spending time with him was one of
the most attractive parts of the conference.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel.
michael a. lebowitz wrote:
the political economy of the working class [of which Marx spoke favourably
...
Mr. Lebowitz is obviously referring to Marx's Inaugural Address for the
International Working Men's Association. In his talk, Marx employs the phrase
the political economy of the working
Louis wrote:
But it was also a war in the Pacific without any discernible *class*
differences between Japanese and American imperialism. It does not
matter if Filipinos welcomed in American troops. That is not our
criterion for deciding whether a war is progressive or not.
True. But, I noted
I am not privy to the details of the history of the Phillipines.
But a few things I know.
I know that the Phillipino patriots of the late XIX century suffered,
at the hands of the American Liberators, the same treatment their
Cuban counterparts had to endure. Afterwards, some have criminalized
On Sep 20, 2009, at 5:10 PM, nada wrote:
Would it have been correct for socialists or internationalists to
demand US Out
of the Philippines???
Of course it would. By the time that swine MacArthur returned the
Japanese had long been strategically defeated and were in a lost
endgame.
I think that, in a general perspective, both Lüko and DWalters are right.
Because whoever won the dispute over the redistribution would herald
the war against the Soviet Union. Both things were the same thing.
2009/9/20 Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de:
nada (dwalters...@gmail.com) wrote on
What about the Antikapitalistische Linke and the other opposition groups. I
may be wrong, but I heard they form a fairly sizeable minority within the
party.
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to:
Geez, I find myself in substantial agreement with Lueko.
- Original Message -
From: Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de
To: David Schanoes sartes...@earthlink.net
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 6:00 PM
YOU MUST clip all extraneous
Swans Commentary
http://www.swans.com/
September 21, 2009
If you read Swans and appreciate the quality of its content please
support us Financially. Thank you. http://www.swans.com/about/donate.html
$ $ $ $ $
Note from the Editors: Want to cut
Hey, I got that reversed-- the diggers were the communists, the levellers
were the political economists. Oh well, it's the thought that counts.
- Original Message -
From: S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.net
To: David Schanoes sartes...@earthlink.net
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009
Shane (and Nestor),
I wasn't talking about 1945. I was talking about 1942, 43 and 44. US
involvement (or anyones involvement) wasn't a mechanical placement of
troops or reoccupation. No US Aid to the Philippines (no one raised
this in any event, it would of been stupid) I asked because the US
In January 1975, I was invited to debate Norman Borlaug at Santa Barbara
Community College. Because of his fame, it was scheduled for a very large
auditorium. For some reason, he did not or could not show up, but
participated via some video hookup on a movie screen.
I attacked the Green
On Sep 20, 2009, at 7:54 PM, nada wrote:
Shane (and Nestor),
I wasn't talking about 1945. I was talking about 1942, 43 and 44.
After Coral Sea and Midway Japan had strategically lost, just as the
Germans had strategically lost after Stalingrad.
The US occupation of the Philippines was part
Here is the Marx section. Again, this is quick, so any help would be
appreciated.
Read more at:
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com/2009/09/21/political-economy-for-the-21st-century-marx/turkey-2/
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929
530 898
Here is the correct link
Sorry
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com/2009/09/21/political-economy-for-the-21st-century-marx/turkey-2-2/
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929
530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com
typos:
Page 2: Henry Adams, son and grandson of presidents [not presence]
Page 2: The objective... to keep Britain from siding with the Confederacy
[not the United States].
- Original Message -
From: Michael Perelman mich...@ecst.csuchico.edu
To: David Schanoes
Disagree with your interpretation that the workers [of Britain] had an
immediate interest in supporting the Confederacy-- as the cotton from the
South meant employment in textile mills.
What distinguishes Marxist analysis from political economy is not politics
vs. economy, or politics over
I missed this when it came out.
CB
U.S. May Not Recognize Results of Honduran Vote
By Mary Beth Sheridan
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 4, 2009
The U.S. government on Thursday toughened its stance against
Honduras's coup leaders and supporters, threatening to put them in a
31 matches
Mail list logo
