No where is this insinuated. I can't understand how anyone could take that
reading from his article.
From his NLR piece entitled 'Against Diversity':
“In 1947 –seven years before Brown v. Board of Education, sixteen years
before The Feminine Mystique –the top fifth of American wage-earners
A good critique would take what he actually says
and show how some of it is empirically wrong and politically a bad tactic.
Well, what he sloppily insinuates about income inequality and New Left
movements being the cause of it, is easily refutable.
But as far as tactics are concerned, I'd
