Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-18 Thread brad bauerly
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Mark wrote: Actually, in saying this, brad is himself climbing on board with the

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-18 Thread brad bauerly
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Greg- I can not begin to unravel what that guy was posting on FB. The only thing I

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-18 Thread Vicki White
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 4/18/10, brad bauerly bbaue...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-18 Thread S. Artesian
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == No, I'm saying what I was saying-- that to argue that the TP movement exists or

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-18 Thread Greg McDonald
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, brad bauerly bbaue...@gmail.com wrote: Greg- I

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-18 Thread Shane Mage
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:35 AM, S. Artesian wrote: No, I'm saying what I was

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-17 Thread Greg McDonald
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:10 PM, brad bauerly bbaue...@gmail.com wrote: I do

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-17 Thread Mark Lause
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == brad bauerly bbaue...@gmail.com wrote: I also don't know if we should be on board

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-17 Thread S. Artesian
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I can agree with CH also. The point ML was making was not to avoid talking to

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Thomas Piercy
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 04/17/2010 01:11 PM, S. Artesian wrote: the movement as a social movement

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-17 Thread S. Artesian
Schanoes sartes...@earthlink.net Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 4:23 PM Subject: Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-17 Thread Mark Lause
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == My last post of the day...Number 5, I think Ditto to S. Artesian and Chris.

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-16 Thread brad bauerly
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Mark wrote: Gee, brad, didn't you already know the material basis of their anger.

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-16 Thread S. Artesian
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == You're assuming these are workers. I make no such assumption. The actions I'm

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-16 Thread Mark Lause
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I don't know if anybody posted this piece on the tea partyers yet: White

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-16 Thread Christopher Hutchinson
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == The real question is if there are elements of the working class in the tea party

[Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-15 Thread Bhaskar Sunkara
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == http://theactivist.org/blog/the-anatomy-of-teabagging

Re: [Marxism] The Anatomy of Teabagging

2010-04-15 Thread Mark Lause
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == The observations are interesting, but the essence of the approach confounds the tea