SV: M-TH: Re: Revolution and the tasks of the day

2000-04-05 Thread Bob Malecki
Jeff wrote > So I suppose the question here is how do we avoid repeating the scenario and > instituting one regime with another, how do we avoid throwing out the > bourgoisie and merely replacing them with another ruling class "in the name > of the workers" which becomes more attached to prese

Re: M-TH: Re: Revolution and the tasks of the day

2000-04-05 Thread davidb
Gidday Jeff, I think there is a qualitative difference between Lenin and Trotsky's disciplinary actions and Stalins. The former were answerable to a party that still represented the politically conscious workers. Kronstadt is probably the best example of a workers' state killing rebellious work

Re: M-TH: Re: Revolution and the tasks of the day

2000-04-05 Thread Jeff1199p
Greetings, Since I'm new and only been reading along for a few weeks, I don't know the proper protocol for new "introductions" here. My sense is that what is said is more important than who, so I won't go through and list every one of Marx's works I've read. As to the other stuff, I'd descri

M-TH: Re: Revolution and the tasks of the day

2000-04-05 Thread Rob Schaap
Hi again, Hugh. I'm terrifically busy just now, so can't answer in detail. >The automatic linking of Bolshevism with Stalinism, and the idea that >Stalinism grew necessarily and organically out of the revolutionary >Bolshevism of Lenin and Trotsky. I've never made the Bolshie>Stalin link appe

M-TH: Re: Revolution and the tasks of the day

2000-04-04 Thread Hugh Rodwell
Gidday Rob, >Sez Hugh of the little disagreement of late: > >>it's part of the struggle for the leadership of the working class, > >It might be an analogue of some such struggle in some place and time, but I >doubt anyone here really seeks to lead the working class. I don't anyway. Always the