John Walker wrote:
Just a BRIEF reply to Dave's reply to Rob.
Without wanting to sound too sectarian there were a few points in the
repy which don't seem to make much sense to me. The arguement appears
to be that we should defend Yugoslavia as well as supporting the
right of Kosovars to
Dave B writes in reply to John W in Manchester:
In response to John;
1. Dual defensism? Defense against imperialism takes priority. But
Kosovars should defend themselves also against any Serb oppression.
Right. Note that the Serb regime represents on the one hand an oppressed
nation being
G'day Dave,
A quibble ...
You write:
When NATO and imperialism are defeated or out of
the Balkans, we can call for the implementation of self-determination
for Kosovo. It may be that the result will be a Kosovar Socialist
Republic in a Balkan Federation which will include Serbia, Croatia
The Crisis in Yugoslavia and its Relationship to Global Fascism
27 April 1999
Richard K. Moore
http://cyberjournal.org
Among the lies and hypocrisies which characterize media reportage on NATO's
aggression
G'day Thaxists,
Anyone know exactly where I got this Karlism? I've lost the cite and my
books are at home.
"... the *practice* of philosophy is itself *theoretical.* It is
the *critique* that measures the individual existence by the
essence, the particular reality by the Idea."
Ta.
Rob.
Jim,
Filled in the empty spaces..
Bob
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 16:39:49 +0200
From: "Bob Malecki" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: M-TH: Re: paragraph on Balkans
Jim replies to Dave!
Without wanting to sound too sectarian there were a few points in the
repy which don't seem to make much
Hugh Replies!
Right. Note that the Serb regime represents on the one hand an oppressed
nation being attacked by imperialism (like Iraq) and on the other an
oppressor nation with a clear record of fascist Master Race (in this case
Greater Serb) claims over and against other nations. The one
