Bill,
I would appreciate that reference.
It didnt mean to say, did I? that deregulation was driven by
multinational capital. I see the drive coming from the limits of the
internal market for NZ national productive capital - the LOV
asserting itself.. That's where I differ from the MNC bogey the
Trouble with this theory is that, back during Yeltsin's first war against
Chechnya, Clinton's U.S. backed Russia all the way. The imperialists
know their comrades-in-blood when they see them in action.
Walter Daum
Did they Walter? I doubt it. More of a realization that a military
confro
The antagonism shown by Washington to both Iran and Iraq is
further evidence that Washington does not mount opposition to a power
simply because it is state socialist, or revolutionary socialist. Neither
Iran nor Iraq fit into any of these categories in any comprehensive sense.
Washington
Gidday Dave
Yeah I pretty much agree with the first paragraph, from my perspective
differential rent on pastoral production was the basis for NZ's sad and
deeply flawed little variant of fordism - fordism in the sense that Jessop
has advanced (Bastard keynesian economics+welfare state+some way of
Trouble with this theory is that, back during Yeltsin's first war against
Chechnya, Clinton's U.S. backed Russia all the way. The imperialists
know their comrades-in-blood when they see them in action.
Walter Daum
On Wed, 06 Oct 1999 15:13:10 PDT Macdonald Stainsby said:
>
[...]
>
>Actually, Bo