In a message dated 10/3/2008 10:29:01 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
Nobody intelligent is suggesting voting against a candidate because he's
labeled bourgeois. The issue at stake is the One party with two right
wings (Gore Vidal)
I was going to skip it, but someone made me watch it. Hitherto, I
had avoided Gov. Paleface. I was astounded at what an idiot she is.
She could be a contestant on The Price Is Right; I can't imagine her
as president. (Then again, we've had a retarded monkey in the White
House for 8 years.)
On Oct 3, 2008, at 6:57 AM, Ralph Dumain wrote:
It is a given that any high-level candidate, certainly a presidential
candidate, is a bourgeois politician. That the left would even
debate whether to argue against a candidate because he represents
bourgeois interests is silly. That is a
Shane Mage
On Oct 3, 2008, at 6:57 AM, Ralph Dumain wrote:
It is a given that any high-level candidate, certainly a presidential
candidate, is a bourgeois politician. That the left would even
debate whether to argue against a candidate because he represents
bourgeois interests is silly.
I watched the Vice Presidential debate with my wife in its entirety.
Govern Palin is scary and revealed her fascist streak in suggesting the
expansion of the Vice President's role beyond the executive branch into the
legislative function of government. I thought at first that she
