Alberta Eugenics Board
In 1928, the Province of Alberta, Canada, passed legislation that
enabled the government to perform involuntary sterilizations on
individuals classified as mentally deficient. In order to implement
the Sexual Sterilization Act of Alberta in 1928, a four-person Alberta
Racial hygiene
Racial hygiene (often labeled a form of scientific racism) is the
selection, by a government, of the putatively most physical,
intellectual and moral persons to raise the next generation (selective
breeding) and a close alignment of public health with eugenics.
Racial hygiene was
Waistline2 :
Shane is a racist
CB: In my opinion, based on reading Shane's many posts over the years,
his thinking and writing is not racist.
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or
In a message dated 8/26/2009 9:47:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
cb31...@gmail.com writes:
Shane is a racist
CB: In my opinion, based on reading Shane's many posts over the years,
his thinking and writing is not racist.
Comment
What you call racist I call white chauvinist. What I
In a message dated 8/24/2009 10:42:07 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
shm...@pipeline.com writes:
nothing worth remembering
Shane Mage
Comment
You asked the question what's wrong with eugenics? . . . not I. You claim
that the eugenics movement is a movement for good health and shifted
On 8/26/09, waistli...@aol.com cb31...@gmail.com writes:
Shane is a racist
CB: In my opinion, based on reading Shane's many posts over the years,
his thinking and writing is not racist.
Comment
What you call racist I call white chauvinist. What I call racist is anyone
In a message dated 8/26/2009 12:22:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
cb31...@gmail.com writes:
CB: Shane's posts are not racist/white chauvinist.
Comment
Why the subterfuge? I wrote nothing about Shane's post. I responded to the
question: What's wrong with eugenics. Why not still to the
Waistline2
cb31450 at gmail.com writes:
CB: Shane's posts are not racist/white chauvinist.
Comment
Why the subterfuge ? I wrote nothing about Shane's post. I responded to the
question: What's wrong with eugenics. Why not still to the point?
^
CB: I'm replying to where you say Shane is
In a message dated 8/26/2009 1:23:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
cb31...@gmail.com writes:
His what's wrong with eugenics ? I took as half joking, not to
advocate in favor of the well known
historically racist eugenics efforts. Not all historical eugenics
theories were based on a
I of course do not support or advocate for eugenics.
Do you?
WL.
^
CB: I support genetic engineering that would cure genetically based
blindness, cancer, heart disease or other universally recognized
diseases. See below
CB: I can't say that I subscribe to any old eugenics theories,
I of course do not support or advocate for eugenics.
Do you?
WL.
^
CB: I can't say that I subscribe to any old eugenics theories, but
not all eugenics theories are based on the notion that there are
better and lesser races.
What is eugenics and the eugenics movement
The idea of creating better humans presuppose qualifying what is better
and according to the founder of the eugenics movement, better is a class
and social construct based on economic status and productive worth for
capital. Productive worth for capital is called survival of the fittest. Those
In a message dated 8/24/2009 1:46:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
cb31...@gmail.com writes:
CB: On the other hand, there is some truth to the old saying that the
rich get richer and the poor get children under capitalism. That is,
those who are poor because they have trouble selling their
Jim F. Shane is a racist operating under the cloak of anti-Stalinism to
prevent an unraveling of
materialist concept of history and society. Racist are racist precisely
because they embrace a concept of races amongst humanity.
Correction
Jim F. FALLS INTO THE TRAP.
Shane is a
@lists.econ.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] What's wrong with eugenics?
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:43:18 EDT
In a message dated 8/20/2009 6:36:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
shm...@pipeline.com writes:
Are you confused by the capitalization-to-start-sentences style rule I
(unfortunately) adhered
On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:43 PM, waistli...@aol.com wrote:
As I understand things in my confusion, what is meant is the
striving for
good health through the selection of positive - (life affirming
hereditary traits that strengthen the human organism and increases
longevity) more
We have developed beyond mere natural eugenics. Genetic science
already allows screening of any fetus for serious hereditary defects (remember
how Palin trumpeted her disgenic choice to carry a defective fetus to
term?) and women can and (most) do act eugenically to abort those fetuses. *In
Comment
Trotsky’s letter is 75 years old. In my way of thinking 75 years is two
generation.
Here is the problem for me.
I cannot conceive and think things out from the standpoint of a person
Trotsky’s age in 1934. I reread the letter in its entirety. Moreover,
everything in it seems
What's wrong with eugenics? Is anyone in favor of disgenics?
Shane Mage
Comment
What is wrong with eugenics is its social origin, individual origin,
purpose, practice and the ideological conceptions of its adherents.
Eugenics is not a science of metabolic process but an ideology
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:11 PM, waistli...@aol.com wrote:
What's wrong with eugenics? Is anyone in favor of disgenics?
Eugenics is not a science of metabolic process but an ideology of
fascism.
Eugenics means good heredity. Disgenics means bad heredity.
No ideology here.
All parents desire
In a message dated 8/20/2009 2:18:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
shm...@pipeline.com writes:
Eugenics means good heredity. Disgenics means bad heredity. No
ideology here. All parents desire healthy, bright, strong, beautiful, talented
children, and want those characteristics to be
On Aug 20, 2009, at 5:25 PM, waistli...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2009 2:18:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
shm...@pipeline.com writes:
Eugenics means good heredity. Disgenics means bad heredity. No
ideology here. All parents desire healthy, bright, strong,
beautiful,
In a message dated 8/20/2009 6:36:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
shm...@pipeline.com writes:
Are you confused by the capitalization-to-start-sentences style rule I
(unfortunately) adhered to? eugenics (nonrestrictive noun) is not
Eugenics (restrictive noun). The former's meaning is
23 matches
Mail list logo
