I am not sure about what is wrong with staying close
to the intuitive judgments of science.
It is only partly accurate to say that falsifiability
has not received any interest among philosophers of
science. First, things are more complicated. The
question to which Popper posed the
I have discussed falsifiability on various lists.
See:
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/2002/2002-January/82.html
http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2004w52/msg00209.htm
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:51:26 -0700 (PDT) andie nachgeborenen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not sure about
AN wrote this I am not sure about what is wrong with staying close
to the intuitive judgments of science.
in response to this:
CJPopper never really moved that far away from intuitive judgements
about what scientists might actually do and believe.
---
Intuitive
Ralph,
Why are you saying all this stuff about humanity is doomed and there will
never be communism? It contradicts the efforts you have made as an
auto-didact and to make liberatory material available to other people. True
if we want to get from where we are now to communism we will need a
