Should be fixed with r8178.
Regards,
-JJ
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:48 PM, John Hunter wrote:
>> JJ is this related to your commit in r8035 : "support
>> unsampled image for ps backend"
>
> It seems to be.
> I'll take a look.
>
> Regards,
>
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:48 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> JJ is this related to your commit in r8035 : "support
> unsampled image for ps backend"
It seems to be.
I'll take a look.
Regards,
-JJ
--
Download Intel® Parallel St
examples/pylab_examples/image_nonuniform.py is broken in HEAD
An attempt to access "self._oldxslice" in _get_unsampled_image is
implicated: JJ is this related to your commit in r8035 : "support
unsampled image for ps backend"
File
"/home/jdhunter/dev/lib/python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/bac
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Jonathan Taylor wrote:
>> I am strongly in favor of keeping the entire commit history of
>> trunk/matplotlib. While the repo is large now, most of the size comes
>> from data and regression test images, and the early history is largely
>> code so will not add much
> I am strongly in favor of keeping the entire commit history of
> trunk/matplotlib. While the repo is large now, most of the size comes
> from data and regression test images, and the early history is largely
> code so will not add much incremental size. I suppose one of the
> downsides of git i
Cool. Looks good.
I did tweak the image a bit to make the colors stand out better. But only
slightly. Because when I made the shapes too big, the image lost it's MPL
"feel". Here is the source image I used to create the icon. Feel free to give
it a go. There are a number of programs that
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:16 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Ben Axelrod wrote:
>> I am a big fan of favicons. I think MPL should definitely have one for the
>> impending 1.0 release. So I made one for you.
>>
>> To use, simply place this file in the top level web direc
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Ben Axelrod wrote:
> I am a big fan of favicons. I think MPL should definitely have one for the
> impending 1.0 release. So I made one for you.
>
> To use, simply place this file in the top level web directory. That is
> usually all that is required. But some br
John Hunter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>
>> Andrew Straw wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> This is a good point. My preferred option is that we jettison all the
>>> stuff that is not going to be shipped with MPL 1.0 from the git repo.
>>> (More correctly - we build a
I am a big fan of favicons. I think MPL should definitely have one for the
impending 1.0 release. So I made one for you.
To use, simply place this file in the top level web directory. That is usually
all that is required. But some browsers prefer if you put:
in the header of the html page
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:29 AM, william ratcliff
wrote:
> I don't want to get into a flame war over this, but if Sourceforge was
> pressured into this and is having complaints and google has the same
> problem, how does Github get around it? Are they incorporated in the US or
> outside? If this
I don't want to get into a flame war over this, but if Sourceforge was
pressured into this and is having complaints and google has the same
problem, how does Github get around it? Are they incorporated in the US or
outside? If this is likely to become a problem, is there another service
that can
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> Andrew Straw wrote:
> [...]
>> This is a good point. My preferred option is that we jettison all the
>> stuff that is not going to be shipped with MPL 1.0 from the git repo.
>> (More correctly - we build a git repo without that stuff ever going
13 matches
Mail list logo
