On 22 March 2010 12:48, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
> I guess I misunderstood your original issue.
> I think I fixed this in r8210. So please give it a try.
Ah, thank you, that does appear to have solved it. (I'll double-check
when I don't have to run it through an ssh tunnel, but the display
looks good.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Jörgen Stenarson
wrote:
> Would it be possible to put the draw in the ipython_prompt hook. That
> way it is always called after you have done something.
I like this approach better, because one problem with doing it in the
mpl Artist layer is that one artist set
Fernando Perez skrev 2010-03-22 01:10:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>> I wonder if it's possible to put things like a draw_if_interactive()
>>> call at the end of the OO methods... I realize that pyplot was the
>
I guess I misunderstood your original issue.
I think I fixed this in r8210. So please give it a try.
Regards,
-JJ
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Anne Archibald
wrote:
> On 21 March 2010 18:10, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Anne Archibald
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Of
Rectangle selection also kind of bugs out when you reach the edge of the axes.
I looked into fixing this a while ago and had a partial solution. The
rectangle selector does some inaxes checking and relies on the xdata and ydata
values. These are invalid outside the axes, but you can fake it b
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Mmh, back to this one: I do think it would be something useful to have
> somewhere, because typing draw() after *every* operation when working
> interactively does get tiresome, it seems to me... If we encourage
> calling subplots() for new
You're correct - not sure what I was thinking of.
I'm going to claim that it must have been this way in an older version and been
fixed to make myself feel better...
From: Anne Archibald [peridot.face...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 8:39 AM
To
On 22 March 2010 11:32, Drain, Theodore R (343P)
wrote:
> I'd like to throw another vote in for this feature as well. We have a lot of
> cases like this and not being able to zoom to the limits of the window is a
> real head ache.
I'd just like to point out that it's the UI that's deceptive: y
I'd like to throw another vote in for this feature as well. We have a lot of
cases like this and not being able to zoom to the limits of the window is a
real head ache.
Back in the old days (when we were maintaining our own plot library), we solved
this by allowing the bounding rectangle to be
