On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 21:55, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>> That's valid. I guess I am just wondering if there is a decent error
>> message to the user explaining that the test could not proceed.
>
> Rig the test runner to properly skip them ins
Mac binaries for Python 2.6 and 32-bit Python 2.7 are now uploaded.
-- Russell
On Oct 6, 2011, at 8:18 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:57 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> ...
> Actually, if you can just upload the binaries directly to
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/u
Oops. Sorry about that.
1.1.0 built fine under Python 2.7 and passes all tests (except one known skip).
I'll build 2.6 next and then upload both.
-- Russell
On Oct 7, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> This build you are doing is v1.0.1, which is the old version. Did you grab
> the w
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> That's valid. I guess I am just wondering if there is a decent error
> message to the user explaining that the test could not proceed.
Rig the test runner to properly skip them instead of failing? The
test data should be considered a depen
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Russell E. Owen wrote:
> I'm running into an error building the Mac binary:
>
> d-69-91-185-129:/Archives/PythonPackages/matplotlib-1.0.1 rowen$
> bdist_mpkg
> basedirlist is: ['/usr/local']
>
I'm running into an error building the Mac binary:
d-69-91-185-129:/Archives/PythonPackages/matplotlib-1.0.1 rowen$
bdist_mpkg
basedirlist is: ['/usr/local']
=
===
BUILDING MATPLOTLIB
matplotlib: 1.0.1
