On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> Rolling this into the Python package distribution scheme seems backwards
> though, since a lot of binary packages that have nothing to do with Python
> are used as well
Yep, exactly.
>
> To solve the exact problem you (and me) have
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:23 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> What I do -- and documented for people in my lab to do -- is set up
>>> one virtualenv in my
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:34 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> Buildout, virtualenv all work by sandboxing from the system python:
>> each of them do not see each other, which may be useful for
>> development, but as a d
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Andrew Straw wrote:
>>
> Typically, the dependencies only depend on the smallest subset of what
> they require (if they don't need lapack, they'd only depend on
> python-numpy-core in your example), but yes, if there's an unsatisfiable
> condition, then apt-get wil
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:32:00AM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> [snip]
>> - supporting different variants of the same package in the
>> dependency graph at install time
>
>> [snip]
>
>> T
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Pierre Raybaut wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Following your announcement for the 'toydist' module, I think that
> your project is very promising: this is certainly a great idea and it
> will be very controversial but that's because people expectactions are
> great on this
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
> I should defer to the description of extras in the setuptools
> documentation. It is only a few paragraphs long:
>
> http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools#declaring-extras-optional-features-with-their-own-dependencies
Ok, so th
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:03 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> Executable: grin
>> module: grin
>> function: grin_main
>>
>> Executable: grind
>> module: grin
>> fun
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:03 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> Executable: grin
>> module: grin
>> function: grin_main
>>
>> Executable: grind
>> module: grin
>> fun
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:15 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
>
> Sitting down with Tarek(who is one of the current distutils
> maintainers) in Berlin we had a little discussion about packaging over
> pizza and beer... and he was quite mindful of OS packagers problems
> and issues.
This has been said ma
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:36 AM, René Dudfield wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:34 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:27 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
>>
>>> Buildout is what a lot of the python community are using now.
>>
>> I would like
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:27 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
> Buildout is what a lot of the python community are using now.
I would like to note that buildout is a solution to a problem that I
don't care to solve. This issue is particularly difficult to explain
to people accustomed with buildout in m
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:27 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the toydist proposal/release notes, I would address 'what does
> toydist do better' more explicitly.
>
>
>
> A big problem for science users is that numpy does not work with
> pypi + (easy_install, buildout or pip) and python
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:29:24PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Perhaps this could be useful:
>> http://checkinstall.izto.org/
>
> Yes, checkinstall is really cool. However, I tend to prefer things with
> no magic that I don't have to sandbo
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> Do you here mean automatic generation of Ubuntu debs, Debian debs, Windows
> MSI installer, Windows EXE installer, and so on? (If so then great!)
Yes (although this is not yet implemented). In particular on windows,
I want to imple
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Stefan Schwarzburg
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I would like to add a comment from the user perspective:
>>>
>>> - the main reason
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Stefan Schwarzburg
wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to add a comment from the user perspective:
>
> - the main reason why I'm not satisfied with pypi/distutils/etc. and why I
> will not be satisfied with toydist (with the features you listed), is that
> they break my i
(warning, long post)
Hi there,
As some of you already know, the packaging and distributions of
scientific python packages have been a constant source of frustration.
Open source is about making it easy for anyone to use software how
they see fit, and I think python packaging infrastructure has
Andrew Straw wrote:
> I looked a little further, and it depends on the directory that the
> tests are run from -- if I manually log into the build slave, I can
> get the tests to run (in fact, one segfaults) if I try from a
> different working directory. Anyhow, now that I have a handle on it, I
Andrew Straw wrote:
> Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> I know it's been a while since you announced this, but I'm just
>> looking into this now.
>
> Also, I got some ways in making the buildbot build with numscons, but
> I stopped at a bug where it looked like the matplotlib.tests.* modules
> were no
Andrew Straw wrote:
> David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't know if that's of any interest for matplotlib developers,
>> but I added scripts to build matplotlib with numscons:
>>
>> http://github.com/cournape/matplotlib/tree/sco
Andrew Straw wrote:
> David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't know if that's of any interest for matplotlib developers,
>> but I added scripts to build matplotlib with numscons:
>>
>> http://github.com/cournape/matplotlib/tree/sco
Andrew Straw wrote:
> David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> Andrew Straw wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Andrew Straw wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> David Cournapeau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Andrew Straw wrote:
> Andrew Straw wrote:
>
>> David Cournapeau wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have a question about git as well, actually - I could not update the
>>> svn metadata, unfortunately, by using git-svn rebase -l (I used your
>>>
Andrew Straw wrote:
> David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't know if that's of any interest for matplotlib developers,
>> but I added scripts to build matplotlib with numscons:
>>
>> http://github.com/cournape/matplotlib/tree/sc
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Straw wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> It certainly is of interest to me. When I get a little time (maybe this
> weekend), I'd like to try it. Specifically, I'd like to setup a buildbot
> that would automatically build and run the test suite with it. Along
> those lines, is there any rea
Hi,
I don't know if that's of any interest for matplotlib developers,
but I added scripts to build matplotlib with numscons:
http://github.com/cournape/matplotlib/tree/scons_build
Not every configuration is supported yet, but I can successfully build
matplotlib on Linux with gtk or wx backen
27 matches
Mail list logo
