I did. But there's no manual, and the 'under construction'
placeholders in the 'how do I?' and tutorial didn't give a great first
impression. I see now there's a link to some example code, but it's a
lot more intimidating than the matplotlib introductory stuff.
>
> Did you find http://code.enthou
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:04:13AM -0500, Paul Kienzle wrote:
> Is there anybody outside of enthought who are deploying applications
> based on TraitsUI for Windows/Mac/Linux? I would love to hear about
> successful examples before committing to more dependencies in our own
> applications.
I, i
On Feb 13, 2008 10:04 AM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:24:35AM -0600, John Hunter wrote:
> > As I mentioned in my earlier post, when we migrate to traits
> > for matplotlib artist properties, we will get a pretty rich
> > interactive UI configuration layer.
>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:24:35AM -0600, John Hunter wrote:
> As I mentioned in my earlier post, when we migrate to traits
> for matplotlib artist properties, we will get a pretty rich
> interactive UI configuration layer.
Any sense of when this might happen?
Is there anybody outside of enthough
On Feb 13, 2008 8:05 AM, Neil Crighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another big difference between matplotlib and chaco: matplotlib has
> online documentation, examples and tutorials. I couldn't find any
> documentation on Chaco when I was looking around for a python plotting
> program. If I had
Another big difference between matplotlib and chaco: matplotlib has
online documentation, examples and tutorials. I couldn't find any
documentation on Chaco when I was looking around for a python plotting
program. If I had, who knows, maybe I'd be using Chaco now instead of
matplotlib :)
-
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> * pylab: I love the pylab API. I want (and I am not the only one) to
> be able to construct a plot with a pylab script, or on the command
> line. I would like to be able to modify it interactively
> afterwards. Chaco's pylab equivalent is orders of magn
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:45:28AM -0800, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > I am so happy to hear you say this. With Traits in MPL, it would be
> > possible to build an interactive plotting application based around
> > envisage, using other envisage plugins
> I'm really no
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> I am so happy to hear you say this. With Traits in MPL, it would be
> possible to build an interactive plotting application based around
> envisage, using other envisage plugins
I'm really not trying to be a troll, but tell me again what MPL has that
Chaco doesn't? It
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:41:34AM -0600, John Hunter wrote:
> It is likely we will support enthought traits for matplotlob figures
> in the not too distant future -- at that point, many of the plot
> elements will have UI dialogs for customization, at least for certain
> backends (Qt and WX most l
John Hunter wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2008 7:32 AM, Neal Becker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The available plotting in pylab is good, but could be a lot better. I've
>> used grace (xmgrace) for years and it's great. After bringing up the
>> plot, I can interactively modify it in all kinds of ways.
On Feb 10, 2008 7:32 AM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The available plotting in pylab is good, but could be a lot better. I've
> used grace (xmgrace) for years and it's great. After bringing up the plot,
> I can interactively modify it in all kinds of ways.
Well, you can certainly mo
The available plotting in pylab is good, but could be a lot better. I've
used grace (xmgrace) for years and it's great. After bringing up the plot,
I can interactively modify it in all kinds of ways.
Any thoughts on a good package to use with pylab? (I know I can easily
enough get pylab to use
13 matches
Mail list logo
