Andrew Straw writes:
>> 3. To make this work, agree that sample data files are immutable: if a
>> new version is needed, it needs to have a new name (and thus the
>> examples using it need to be updated). The files have not been
>> changed a lot [2], so I don't think this is very much
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Straw wrote:
> #1 and #2 seem reasonable to me.
>
> I don't like #3 -- for the same reasons as we want to separate the rest
I agree with Andrew here -- we don't want to hamstring our ability to
change the data just because some people would rather take a v
On 09/12/2010 07:10 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> A while ago there was a discussion [1] about how using the
> get_sample_data function in building the documentation is a problem for
> Debian packagers. Let me see if I understand the goals of
> get_sample_data correctly:
>
> * we want to enable us
A while ago there was a discussion [1] about how using the
get_sample_data function in building the documentation is a problem for
Debian packagers. Let me see if I understand the goals of
get_sample_data correctly:
* we want to enable users to run examples they find in the gallery
without downl
