Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This approach is reported to work on "Macintosh, Unix, and Windows",
> but I've only tested on Linux and OS-X. Please let me know if it
> solves your issue.
It solves my problem on OS X. Thanks!
--
Jouni K. Seppänen
http://www.iki.fi/jks
--
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
>
>> "John Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 7/10/07, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> I'm seeing a bug on OS X, whose file system is by default
>> case-preserving but not case-sens
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> "John Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> On 7/10/07, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> I'm seeing a bug on OS X, whose file system is by default
> case-preserving but not case-sensitive:
>
> 458 -> fontdictObject = self.em
"John Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/10/07, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The comparison is just over the PDF files, old way (Truetype embedding)
>> vs. new way (Type 3 subsetting).
>
> This must be dominated by some weird outliers. I'm seeing great
> results with
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Eric Firing wrote:
>> I second that! I greatly appreciate your contributions, first in
>> chasing down memory leaks and now in reducing file sizes by embedding
>> fonts.
> It's been fun.
Mike,
Good--what's next? You're ready for more fun, I hope. If you are
looki
Eric Firing wrote:
> I second that! I greatly appreciate your contributions, first in
> chasing down memory leaks and now in reducing file sizes by embedding
> fonts.
It's been fun.
Now, Eric, I'm just waiting for you to tell me how this latest batch
reveals another bug on Ubuntu ;) (with all
John Hunter wrote:
> On 7/10/07, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The comparison is just over the PDF files, old way (Truetype embedding)
>> vs. new way (Type 3 subsetting).
[...]
>
> In any case, excellent work!
>
> JDH
>
Mike,
I second that! I greatly appreciate your cont
On 7/10/07, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The comparison is just over the PDF files, old way (Truetype embedding)
> vs. new way (Type 3 subsetting).
> The ratios are different because I chose to highlight the examples that
> are quite "texty". That wasn't a deliberate attempt to
John Hunter wrote:
> On 7/10/07, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> fonts_demo_kw.py: 201744 -> 37326
>> mathtext_demo.py: 129306 -> 26179
>> unicode_demo.py: 45303 -> 20084
>> over all demos in backend_driver.py: 5856001 -> 3390460
>
> When you say "over all demos" do you mean jus
On 7/10/07, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just committed changes that add TTF subsetting to the PDF backend. It
> is completely analogous to the font subsetting recently added to the PS
> backend.
>
> I have added a configuration option, pdf.fonttype, to choose either
> "Type3"
I just committed changes that add TTF subsetting to the PDF backend. It
is completely analogous to the font subsetting recently added to the PS
backend.
I have added a configuration option, pdf.fonttype, to choose either
"Type3" or "Truetype" font output. This may be removed in the future
on
11 matches
Mail list logo
