On 09/17/2010 03:04 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 09:27 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>>
>> I see the change that you made (keep the old order for linux, do the new
>> thing for everything else). This seems like a bad thing to do. Looking
>> at setjmp.h, it includes features.h. features.h
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> Before making that change, I verified that at least on my linux system,
> Python.h defines those two variables the same way that features.h does,
> so the redefinition would be harmless if we did not undefine the
> variables. I don't think we
On 09/16/2010 09:27 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/17/10 1:57 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> On 09/16/2010 08:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/16/2010 8:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 9/16/10
On 9/17/10 1:57 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 08:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/16/2010 8:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 9/16/10 8:00
On 09/16/2010 08:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
>
> On 9/16/2010 8:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>
I tested y
On 09/16/2010 08:45 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 11:16 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> On 09/16/2010 05:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric
On 9/16/10 11:16 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 05:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>
I tested your patch
On 9/16/2010 8:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> I tested your patch with Ubuntu 10.10, and it failed. The problem is
On 09/16/2010 05:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> I tested your patch with Ubuntu 10.10, and it failed. The problem is
On 9/16/10 10:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Sure does. Your patch with that modification is committed to branch and
>> trunk, 8706, 8707. Thank you!
>>
>
> Did someone check on Windows? I was hoping things wouldn't break in
> WrapPython.h when I switched the order of includes, but you never know
On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>>
>> I tested your patch with Ubuntu 10.10, and it failed. The problem is
>> that something is including setjmp.h befor
On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>
> I tested your patch with Ubuntu 10.10, and it failed. The problem is
> that something is including setjmp.h before libpng.h tries to do so via
> pngconf.h,
On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>
I tested your patch with Ubuntu 10.10, and it failed. The problem is
that something is including setjmp.h before libpng.h tries to do so via
pngconf.h, resulting in an error as the compiler trips over t
On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> I tested your patch with Ubuntu 10.10, and it failed. The problem is
>>> that something is including setjmp.h before libpng.h tries to do so via
>>> pngconf.h, resulting in an error as the compiler trips over the
>>> following:
>>
>
> Python.h includes py
On 09/16/2010 01:04 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 9/16/10 5:24 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> On 09/16/2010 09:50 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> As a follow-up, I've implemented the patch for CXX and also patches for
>>> the other files which do not include Python.h first here:
>>>
>>> http://github.com/jason
On 9/16/10 5:24 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 09:50 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> As a follow-up, I've implemented the patch for CXX and also patches for
>> the other files which do not include Python.h first here:
>>
>> http://github.com/jasongrout/matplotlib/commit/a961c299f5d589dae87e06caf5
On 09/16/2010 09:50 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> As a follow-up, I've implemented the patch for CXX and also patches for
> the other files which do not include Python.h first here:
>
> http://github.com/jasongrout/matplotlib/commit/a961c299f5d589dae87e06caf54975eb657ebf3b
>
>
> I've also attached the p
As a follow-up, I've implemented the patch for CXX and also patches for
the other files which do not include Python.h first here:
http://github.com/jasongrout/matplotlib/commit/a961c299f5d589dae87e06caf54975eb657ebf3b
I've also attached the patch.
This patch gets rid of the warnings about rede
Apologies for the long message---I've really tried to be precise and
complete.
On 7/7/10 10:23 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> David Kirkby discovered that a recent SVN version of matplotlib did not
> compile when he was testing a new matplotlib for inclusion in Sage. A
> bug was opened here:
>
> https
David Kirkby discovered that a recent SVN version of matplotlib did not
compile when he was testing a new matplotlib for inclusion in Sage. A
bug was opened here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3022815&group_id=80706&atid=560720
It appears that a patch has been committed to 1
20 matches
Mail list logo
