Hi,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I think most of the points being made here are valid. However, a common
> occurrence (at least for me) is for a user to struggle against a bug
> that I'm currently working on in one of my branches. Looking at the
> main repository,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> It occurred to me that it's also possible to file pull requests very
> early on while working on a branch. This would make these branches that
> others may care about more visible. We would just want some convention
> to say "wait -- th
It occurred to me that it's also possible to file pull requests very
early on while working on a branch. This would make these branches that
others may care about more visible. We would just want some convention
to say "wait -- this branch isn't done yet, don't merge".
Mike
On 09/06/2011 11:
I think most of the points being made here are valid. However, a common
occurrence (at least for me) is for a user to struggle against a bug
that I'm currently working on in one of my branches. Looking at the
main repository, it isn't very discoverable that a solution may already
exist, and t
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 20:16, Matthew Brett wrote:
> The issue being - why not have all the development branches in the
> same main repo?
>
> Because:
>
> a) Everyone needs write access to the main repo
> b) It's much less tempting to start experimental and highly unstable branches
> c) You can g
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:37 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Yo,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:54 PM, John Hunter wrote:
>>> github workflow: this seems to present a different workflow than that
>>> espoused in gitwash used by mpl and
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Yo,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:54 PM, John Hunter wrote:
>> github workflow: this seems to present a different workflow than that
>> espoused in gitwash used by mpl and other projects
>>
>> http://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-flow.h
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Yo,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:54 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> > github workflow: this seems to present a different workflow than that
> > espoused in gitwash used by mpl and other projects
> >
> > http://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-fl
Yo,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:54 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> github workflow: this seems to present a different workflow than that
> espoused in gitwash used by mpl and other projects
>
> http://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-flow.html
>
> I like the idea of lots of feature branches off upstream/
