On 2012/10/14 12:17 AM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> That would be my preference; but has Mike written anything about where PEP8
>> changes should go?
>
> All I can find is this: https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/1153
>
Thanks. It's
All,
I think we are in a messy situation, and we need to reach some agreement
as to how to proceed. This has been discussed a bit in this thread:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=507AFDC6.8000801%40hawaii.edu&forum_name=matplotlib-devel
The name of that thread did not r
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> All,
>
> I think we are in a messy situation, and we need to reach some agreement
> as to how to proceed. This has been discussed a bit in this thread:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=507AFDC6.8000801%40hawaii.edu&
On 2012/10/14 12:44 PM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I think we are in a messy situation, and we need to reach some agreement
>> as to how to proceed. This has been discussed a bit in this thread:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchi
On 14 October 2012 21:22, Eric Firing wrote:
> 3) The potential disagreement is over whether the PEP8 changes should be
> cherry-picked into v1.2.x, or simply left in master. I favor the latter
> course.
I'm not familiar with matplotlib's merge strategy, but I'd agree with
you that making those
I'd agree with Eric on most of his points.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> If some of the PEP8 commits include genuine bug-fixes that need to be in
> v1.2.x, then these fixes should be made via PRs directly against v1.2.x.
I think it is not a good idea to have a PR that mix
On 2012/10/14 4:49 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
> I'd agree with Eric on most of his points.
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> If some of the PEP8 commits include genuine bug-fixes that need to be in
>> v1.2.x, then these fixes should be made via PRs directly against v1.2.x.
>
On 2012/10/14 12:44 PM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I think we are in a messy situation, and we need to reach some agreement
>> as to how to proceed. This has been discussed a bit in this thread:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchi
