Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/26/2011 10:54 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
The submitter info is lost?
And when it was originally submitted?
No, I can improve it so this information is included.
That's clearly
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
If we are not convinced that github issues provides
everything we need, I think we should provide feedback to the github
devs and stick with sourceforge
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/16/2011 08:38 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com
wrote:
are you guys planning on transfering the old bugs to github?
Probably at some point.
As I
On 02/26/2011 09:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firingefir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/16/2011 08:38 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com
wrote:
are you guys planning on transfering the old bugs to
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/26/2011 09:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firingefir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/16/2011 08:38 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Fernando
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/26/2011 09:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firingefir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/16/2011 08:38 AM, Darren Dale
On 02/26/2011 10:54 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firingefir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/26/2011 09:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firingefir...@hawaii.edu
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that the github interface is not great. The github devs seem
to know that everybody complains about it.
Yup. I hold on to the hope that, because it's so egregiously,
painfully broken and braindead and it stands out
On 02/26/2011 01:44 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that the github interface is not great. The github devs seem
to know that everybody complains about it.
Yup. I hold on to the hope that, because it's so egregiously,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
On 02/16/2011 03:53 PM, John Hunter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Michael Droettboommd...@stsci.edu wrote:
Not sure Sourceforge allows custom hooks in SVN.
We have a couple in place already
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm planning on freezing the sourceforge svn repository Friday evening
at 8:00 (NY time), and moving the git repository to its new home on
Hey,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
John, could you freeze the svn repo around noon on Friday? I'll
convert the repositories and push them up to github on Saturday. Is it
possible to close the sourceforge bugtracker, feature requests, etc to
new issues
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
are you guys planning on transfering the old bugs to github?
Probably at some point.
As I
mentioned, I have code lying around for the upload (and to download
from launchpad, but that's irrelevant here). I'm going
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 19:57, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
John, could you freeze the svn repo around noon on Friday? I'll
convert the repositories and push them up to github on Saturday. Is it
possible to close
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 19:57, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
John, could you freeze the svn repo around noon on Friday? I'll
convert the
Not sure Sourceforge allows custom hooks in SVN.
Mike
On 02/16/2011 02:45 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org
mailto:mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 19:57, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com
mailto:jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
Not sure Sourceforge allows custom hooks in SVN.
We have a couple in place already
https://sourceforge.net/project/admin/svn.php?group_id=80706
On 02/16/2011 03:53 PM, John Hunter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Michael Droettboommd...@stsci.edu wrote:
Not sure Sourceforge allows custom hooks in SVN.
We have a couple in place already
https://sourceforge.net/project/admin/svn.php?group_id=80706
Yes. But those aren't custom
The git migration is still on hold, pending the return of CVS service
at sourceforge. According to someone on the sourceforge IRC channel,
CVS is estimated to return this week, but it might slip to next week.
Darren
--
On Feb 7, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
On 07-Feb-11 17:13, Darren Dale wrote:
The git migration is still on hold, pending the return of CVS service
at sourceforge. According to someone on the sourceforge IRC channel,
CVS is estimated to return this week, but
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 7, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
On 07-Feb-11 17:13, Darren Dale wrote:
The git migration is still on hold, pending the return of CVS service
at sourceforge. According to someone on the
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm planning on freezing the sourceforge svn repository Friday evening
at 8:00 (NY time), and moving the git repository to its new home on
Saturday morning.
If you have concerns, please speak up.
John
Hi Folks,
I'm planning on freezing the sourceforge svn repository Friday evening
at 8:00 (NY time), and moving the git repository to its new home on
Saturday morning.
If you have concerns, please speak up.
Darren
--
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Andrew Straw wrote:
[...]
This is a good point. My preferred option is that we jettison all the
stuff that is not going to be shipped with MPL 1.0 from the git repo.
(More correctly - we build a git repo without that stuff
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:29 AM, william ratcliff
william.ratcl...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't want to get into a flame war over this, but if Sourceforge was
pressured into this and is having complaints and google has the same
problem, how does Github get around it? Are they incorporated in the US
John Hunter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Andrew Straw wrote:
[...]
This is a good point. My preferred option is that we jettison all the
stuff that is not going to be shipped with MPL 1.0 from the git repo.
(More correctly - we build
I am strongly in favor of keeping the entire commit history of
trunk/matplotlib. While the repo is large now, most of the size comes
from data and regression test images, and the early history is largely
code so will not add much incremental size. I suppose one of the
downsides of git is
All,
I think the git migration deserves its own thread on the devel list, so
here is a start.
The full svn repo includes much more than just matplotlib: also course,
htdocs, py4science, sample_data, sampledoc_tut, scipy06, toolkits, and
users_guide. Before moving matplotlib, I think we
Eric Firing wrote:
All,
I think the git migration deserves its own thread on the devel list, so
here is a start.
To the uninitiated - a decision is being made that MPL is moving to git
and github. We hope that this move will foster greater contributions
from the community and a blurring
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
Eric Firing wrote:
All,
I think the git migration deserves its own thread on the devel list, so
here is a start.
To the uninitiated - a decision is being made that MPL is moving to git
and github. We hope that
Hi,
Apart from being inflammatory, has anyone considered code.google.com (GC) as
a solution?
;) - speaking as someone with no right to offer an opinion - please,
no. Google blocks Cuba from google code completely, for no obvious
reason, and a) that seems to me quite wrong and outside the
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Apart from being inflammatory, has anyone considered code.google.com(GC) as
a solution?
;) - speaking as someone with no right to offer an opinion - please,
no. Google blocks Cuba from google code
Andrew Straw wrote:
[...]
This is a good point. My preferred option is that we jettison all the
stuff that is not going to be shipped with MPL 1.0 from the git repo.
(More correctly - we build a git repo without that stuff ever going in.)
We can keep the old svn tree around and migrate the
Eric Firing wrote:
All,
I think the git migration deserves its own thread on the devel list, so
here is a start.
Explanation: the last bit of discussion was actually off-list, but
because it was tacked onto a matplotlib-users list thread, and appeared
there in my mailer, I failed to
I think there's a legal reason for the embargo--sourceforge apparently also
has such a policy:
http://sourceforge.net/blog/clarifying-sourceforgenets-denial-of-site-access-for-certain-persons-in-accordance-with-us-law/
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:17 PM, william ratcliff
william.ratcl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there's a legal reason for the embargo--sourceforge apparently also
has such a policy:
36 matches
Mail list logo
