Yes, that works. Many thanks.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 19, 2012, Adam Davis wrote:
>
>> If I do:
>>
>> bar(range(3), [1,0,2])
>>
>> ... then I get 2 bars of a suitable width for a 3 bar
I am trying to get alternating tick labels to move completely above and
completely below the x axis. If I call:
set_ha('top')
... then the number appears fully below the x axis. However, when I call:
set_ha('bottom')
... then the number appears roughly vertically centered on the axis.
If I do:
bar(range(3), [1,0,2])
... then I get 2 bars of a suitable width for a 3 bar chart, with a gap in
between where the middle bar would be if not equal to 0. Yet if I do:
bar(range(3), [1,2,0])
... then I get two bars of equal width. Is there a way to preserve the
space for the mi
Is there a way to reduce the lineweight of the axes frame edge?
Alternatively, is there a way to hide the edge of the frame without turning
the frame off?
Thanks,
Adam
--
Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense
(and without
disrupting imshow)?
- have subplots within subplots so that I can have the plot() calls in one
set of axes within a subplot (using sharex/y) and the imshow() calls in
another subplot?
-Adam
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 09/04/2011 11:12 AM, Adam Da
I have a figure with a number of plots that analyze a source image. I wish
to show the plots along side the image. Unfortunately whichever method I
call last clobbers (leaves blank axes) for the previously called method.
To illustrate:
fig, axs = pylab.subplots(10, 4, sharex=True, sharey=True)
f
