If I do:
bar(range(3), [1,0,2])
... then I get 2 bars of a suitable width for a 3 bar chart, with a gap in
between where the middle bar would be if not equal to 0. Yet if I do:
bar(range(3), [1,2,0])
... then I get two bars of equal width. Is there a way to preserve the
space for the
I am trying to get alternating tick labels to move completely above and
completely below the x axis. If I call:
set_ha('top')
... then the number appears fully below the x axis. However, when I call:
set_ha('bottom')
... then the number appears roughly vertically centered on the axis.
Yes, that works. Many thanks.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012, Adam Davis wrote:
If I do:
bar(range(3), [1,0,2])
... then I get 2 bars of a suitable width for a 3 bar chart, with a gap
in between where
Is there a way to reduce the lineweight of the axes frame edge?
Alternatively, is there a way to hide the edge of the frame without turning
the frame off?
Thanks,
Adam
--
Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make
I have a figure with a number of plots that analyze a source image. I wish
to show the plots along side the image. Unfortunately whichever method I
call last clobbers (leaves blank axes) for the previously called method.
To illustrate:
fig, axs = pylab.subplots(10, 4, sharex=True, sharey=True)
, Adam Davis wrote:
I have a figure with a number of plots that analyze a source image. I
wish to show the plots along side the image. Unfortunately whichever
method I call last clobbers (leaves blank axes) for the previously
called method.
To illustrate:
fig, axs = pylab.subplots(10
